Tax Administration: IRS Issued Advanced Child Tax Credit Payments on Time but Should Study Lessons Learned: GAO-04-372

February 2004
GAO Reports;2/17/2004, p1
Government Document
The Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 provided eligible taxpayers up to $400 in advance Child Tax Credit (ACTC) payments. GAO was asked for information on (1) the number, dollar amount, and timeliness of the ACTC payments, (2) the impact on the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS's) toll-free telephone service, (3) the cost to IRS and the Financial Management Service (FMS) for implementing the advance payment effort, including the impact of these costs on other IRS programs, and (4) the extent to which IRS identified and used evaluations from the 2001 advance refund effort to implement the ACTC payment effort and whether an evaluation of the ACTC payment effort is planned. Between July and December 2003, IRS, through FMS, issued over $14 billion in ACTC payments to more than 25 million taxpayers. IRS was able to issue the checks on schedule over a 15-day period ending August 8, 2003, to taxpayers who had filed by April 15, 2003. Other taxpayers received their checks later. The ACTC had an impact on IRS's toll-free telephone assistance service. Between late July, when the first notices of the advance payments were sent to taxpayers, and the middle of August, by which time the majority of notices had been sent, IRS experienced both a marked increase in the number of telephone call attempts from taxpayers and a corresponding decline in taxpayers' success in reaching an IRS assistor. IRS's strategy for dealing with the expected increase in taxpayer inquiries may have mitigated the impact of the ACTC payment effort on IRS's toll-free telephone service. According to IRS and FMS officials, implementing the ACTC payment effort cost about $32 million, nearly all incurred by IRS. In order to accomplish this mandate, IRS used funds earmarked for other programs. As a result, some of these programs, for example improvements to IRS's computer servers, were delayed slightly. IRS officials said they identified and used "lessons learned" from the evaluations of the 2001 advance refund effort done by GAO and the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, and their own internal evaluation. With the exception of the telephone service, IRS officials believe the implementation of the ACTC has gone more smoothly because they used the lessons learned. Although IRS officials acknowledged the usefulness of the lessons learned evaluation, IRS had not committed to a similar evaluation of the ACTC effort at the time of our review.


Related Articles

  • Financial Management: Some DOD Contractors Abuse the Federal Tax System with Little Consequence: GAO-04-95.  // GAO Reports;2/12/2004, p1 

    GAO was asked to determine (1) the magnitude of unpaid federal taxes owed by Department of Defense (DOD) contractors, (2) whether indications exist of abuse or criminal activity by DOD contractors related to the federal tax system, (3) whether DOD and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) have...

  • GASB paper explores basic differences in accounting. Cheney, Glenn // Accounting Today;5/1/2006, Vol. 20 Issue 8, p16 

    Deals with a study conducted by the U.S. Governmental Accounting Standards Board on the difference of governmental accounting and financial reporting with the financial assessments of private companies. Implications of the study for issues concerning taxation in the country; Total of state and...

  • Frank Talk from Basel.  // Banking;Sep69, Vol. 62 Issue 3, p66 

    Presents the comments of the Bank for International Settlements in its 1968-69 report on how some countries have been managing their financial affairs. Causes of inflation in Great Britain; Purpose of the U.S. for increasing taxes; Contribution of inflation in the imbalances in international...

  • Announcement 99-11. Magaw, John W. // Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms Quarterly Bulletin;06/16/99-09/16/99, Vol. 3, p33 

    Provides information on the announcement on the year 2000 advisory for payment of taxes in the United States. Background; Industry contingency planning for internal systems; Emergency provisions; Intervening laws.

  • Withholding Tax Riles Government Contractors. Prysock, Mark // Financial Executive;Nov2006, Vol. 22 Issue 9, p65 

    The article focuses on the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 and its effect on government contractors. It states that Section 511 of the bill mandates that U.S. federal, state, and local governments are to withhold three percent from payments for goods and services,...

  • Tax Freedom Day for 2003 is April 19--11 days earlier than in 2000. Stephenson, Howard // Enterprise/Salt Lake City;4/28/2003, Vol. 32 Issue 44, p26 

    Focuses on Tax Freedom Day, a day when people in the U.S. have earned enough money to pay off their total tax bill for the year. Factors that should be considered to make the average American tax burden lighter; Tax Freedom Day in Utah in 2003; History of tax burdens in the U.S.

  • Last-Minute Tips for Saving Tax Dollars. Daks, Martin C. // njbiz;1/1/2003, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p30 

    Provides tips on saving tax dollars in the U.S.

  • IRS issues guidance on timing of penalty-free IRA education...  // CPA Journal;Jan1998, Vol. 68 Issue 1, p14 

    Reports on the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 in the United States. Withdrawals permitted by the act for IRA owners; Guidance issued by the IRA about the effective date of the provision; Qualifying expenses.

  • Inside the New Schedule M-3. Castellano, Donna // CPA Journal;Sep2006, Vol. 76 Issue 9, p48 

    The article focuses on developing an action plan for corporate taxation compliance. The process of readying a corporate tax department for Schedule M-3 compliance entails several crucial steps including the identification of the tasks necessary to adjust the tax department such as information...


Read the Article


Sign out of this library

Other Topics