For Devolution

August 2005
National Review;8/29/2005, Vol. 57 Issue 15, p13
Focuses on the debate over teaching intelligent design or evolution in U.S. public schools. The rationale for not accepting natural selection as the only explanation for the development of human beings; The role of the Supreme Court in making evolution a national issue; Suggestion that local schools should make the decision on what is taught.


Related Articles

  • An intelligently designed response.  // Nature Methods;Dec2007, Vol. 4 Issue 12, p983 

    The author reflects on the myth of intelligent design (ID) as a scientific theory. It is noted that most insidous movement promotes ID as an alternative scientific theory to evolution by natural selection. Survey reveals that incidents of school curricula are altered to include ID alarmed Italy...

  • EVOLUCIÓN: ¿UNA TEORÍA? AZNAVURIAN, AVEDIS // Ludus Vitalis;2009, Vol. 17 Issue 32, p221 

    This paper reviews the status of evolutionary and natural selection theories, based on their solidity as scientific stances. Recent analysis that confirm and discuss some of its fundaments are considered, specially those given by researchers in the biological sciences, as well as the diverse...

  • "Intelligent Design": A Lamb in Wolf's Clothing. Dobson, Geoffrey // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Sep/Oct2006, Vol. 26 Issue 5, p34 

    The article presents the author's comments on intelligent design (ID) practices. He criticized ID advocates who claim that ID should be taught in the science classroom as an alternative to the theory of natural selection. He explained why ID advocates particularly focus on scientist Chales...

  • WASHINGTON DIARIST: Creations. Wieseltier, Leon // New Republic;8/22/2005, Vol. 233 Issue 8/9, p38 

    Presents the author's views on the controversy surrounding evolution and intelligent design. Author's view that intelligent design proponents have not demonstrated what they congratulate themselves for demonstrating; Suggestion that intelligent design was conceived as the solution to a religious...

  • Getting Over Dover. Johnson, Phillip E. // Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity;Sep2006, Vol. 19 Issue 7, p12 

    The author discusses the issue concerning Darwin's theory of evolution and Intelligent Design and comments on the decision of federal district judge John E. Jones of the Middle District of Pennsylvania in a case involving the Dover, Pennsylvania school board. Jones has declared the policy of the...

  • Evolution and Creationism in Science: 1880-2000. Bleckmann, Charles A. // BioScience;Feb2006, Vol. 56 Issue 2, p151 

    The journal Science has documented the evolutionist-creationist controversy since it began publication in 1880. The annual number of references suggests the intensity of the public debate. Peaks occurred in response to the Scopes trial (1925) and trials in California (1979-1981), Arkansas...

  • Letters. Winger, Richard; Andrew, Lloyd; LaDow, Ron; Coz, Stephen; Barbarese, J. T.; Dunn, Michael J. // Liberty (08941408);Aug2008, Vol. 22 Issue 7, p4 

    Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including "Judge this!," by Jim Walsh in the July 2008 issue, "When Theories Collide," by Jo Ann Skousen in the July 2008 issue and "Expelled," by Ben Stein in the July 2008 issue.

  • WHY IS MODERN SYNTHESIS STILL IN FORCE? CALDERÓN, JUAN ERNESTO // Ludus Vitalis;2012, Vol. 20 Issue 38, p33 

    The Modern Synthesis has been object of harsh criticism. Nowadays, one of them stems from the 'Intelligent Design Doctrine'. This doctrine questions the possibility of explaining the origin of novel living forms through the process of natural selection that acts on phenotypic characters....

  • No contest.  // New Scientist;7/9/2005, Vol. 187 Issue 2507, p5 

    The article reports that eighty years after the infamous monkey trial, when John Scopes was tried for teaching evolution, pressure on Charles Darwin's theory is growing once again. Intelligent design uses the language of science to argue that man will never understand nature unless he takes the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics