TITLE

INTERVENTION MAY NOT FOLLOW CONSENT DECREE

PUB. DATE
July 1983
SOURCE
Labor Law Journal;Jul83, Vol. 34 Issue 7, p407
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the ruling in the case EEOC v. Eastern Airlines. Age bias claimants could not intervene in an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission suit brought on their behalf after a consent decree had been negotiated between the agency and the employer. The denial was based on the untimely nature of the motion and on the adequacy with which their interests had been represented.
ACCESSION #
17540592

 

Related Articles

  • Courtroom round-up. Aikin, Olga // People Management;2/9/1995, Vol. 1 Issue 3, p45 

    Presents a compilation of court cases about employment in Great Britain. Case of Photostatic Copiers Limited versus Okuda; Damages assessment for breach of contract; Dangers of paying little attention to stress at work; Granting of injunction over garden leave.

  • EEOC Approves New Compliance Policy.  // Labor Law Journal;Sep86, Vol. 37 Issue 9, p664 

    The article discusses the approval of new compliance policy by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). When a respondent fails to comply with EEOC requests for information in a timely and complete manner, the Commission has directed its district directors to take one or more of these...

  • Displacement of Incumbent Denied.  // Labor Law Journal;Jan76, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p62 

    This article reports on the decision of a federal court in the District of Columbia to deny the request of an African American applicant to oust a person hired for a desired position. The court ruled the applicant should receive prospective pay until another position became available. The...

  • Strengthening EEOC Litigation. Slate, David L. // Labor Law Journal;Feb84, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p67 

    Examines the impact of the quality of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's charge investigative process on the composition and quality of the commission's trial court litigation portfolio. Focus on the National litigation plan; Information on charge investigation initiative;...

  • NLRB Order Cannot Be Modified Because of Delay.  // Labor Law Journal;Jul84, Vol. 35 Issue 7, p445 

    The article informs about a ruling stating that the U.S. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) order cannot be modified because of delay. It is well established that the Court of Appeals may not refuse to enforce a backpay order merely because of the Board's delay subsequent to that order in...

  • The Courts and the Development of Labor Policy. Hanslowe, Kurt L. // Labor Law Journal;Nov62, Vol. 13 Issue 11, p895 

    The article presents the interplay between courts and labor policy in New York. It is a case study of the role of courts with respect to labor policy, rather than a comprehensive national survey. The areas covered in the article are legal control of internal union affairs, arbitration and the...

  • Administration Backs White Firemen In Reverse-Bias Suit.  // Education Week;1/23/1985, Vol. 4 Issue 18, p2 

    The article reports on the case filed by the U.S. Department of Justice against Birmingham, Alabama's fire department for alleged discrimination of two white firefighters. According to the author, the city is required to compensate victims of the allegedly discriminatory policy with promotions,...

  • Burden now on employees to show age bias caused adverse action. Ritter, David B.; Eisenberg, Neal Gerber // HR Specialist: Illinois Employment Law;Mar2010, Vol. 4 Issue 3, p6 

    The article presents several court cases related to labor policy in the U.S. In Gross v. FBL Financial Services Inc., the Supreme Court ruled that a plaintiff could succeed in a mixed motive discrimination claim if he or she could establish that race, national origin, or religion was a...

  • What About Employee Suits?  // National Underwriter / P&C;3/7/2005, Vol. 109 Issue 9, p30 

    Reports that the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 will not impacted on the pattern and practice lawsuits prosecuted by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission since such lawsuits are not controlled by Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics