TITLE

Plantinga’s Reformed Epistemology: What’s the Question?

AUTHOR(S)
Baker, Deane-Peter
PUB. DATE
April 2005
SOURCE
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Apr2005, Vol. 57 Issue 2, p77
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Alvin Plantinga’sWarranted Christian Beliefis without questionone of the central texts of the Reformed epistemology movement. Critiques of Plantinga’s defence have been both multiple and varied. As varied as these responses are, however, it is my contention that many of them amount to the same thing. It is the purpose of this paper to offer an overview of the main lines of attack that have been directed as Plantinga’s project, and thereafter to show how many, if not most, of these objections can be understood as versions or aspects of the same criticism, what I call the ’Inadequacy Thesis’.
ACCESSION #
17068031

 

Related Articles

  • `Superstition' as a Philosopher's Gloss on Practice: A Rejoinder to D.Z. Phillips. Tilley, Terrence W. // Journal of the American Academy of Religion;Jun2000, Vol. 68 Issue 2, p363 

    Refutes the analysis on the philosophy of religion. Concept of literalism in religious beliefs and practices; Distinction between religious and prudential attitudes in superstitious practices; Context of motives behind true religion and superstition.

  • CONFLICT RESOLUTION FOR MAJOR WORLD RELIGIONS. Pemberton, William H. // ETC: A Review of General Semantics;Summer2000, Vol. 57 Issue 2, p234 

    Examines different beliefs about religion. Definition of belief; Concept of unawared assumptions; Overview of world religions.

  • In Praise of Austerity: A Reply to Forrest. Schellenberg, J. // Sophia;Dec2013, Vol. 52 Issue 4, p695 

    This is an invited response to Peter Forrest's review of my trilogy on the philosophy of religion, which appeared in a previous issue of this journal.

  • HUMEOVA ANALIZA UZROÄŒNOSTI. Begić, Melisa // Sophos;2009, Vol. 2, p93 

    In this work I analyze Hume's understanding of human knowledge. Key issue in this is his critique of induction and his understanding of causality. Because he understood human knowledge in this way, Hume's philosophy was often interpreted as agnostic or skeptic one. Any knowledge of causality is...

  • Knowledge and the trustworthiness of instruments. Lehrer, Keith // Monist;Apr95, Vol. 78 Issue 2, p156 

    Explores the trustworthiness of an instrument of knowledge as a source of information about the world. Analysis of knowledge; Evaluation system of the person; Skepticism and trustworthiness; Externalist objection that knowledge is acceptance connected to the external condition in a reliable...

  • On the logic of common belief and common knowledge. Lismont, Luc; Mongin, Philippe // Theory & Decision;Jul94, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p75 

    Surveys currently available axiomizations of common belief (CB) and common knowledge (CK) by means of modal propositional logics. Formal method of axiomization; Notion of soundness and completeness theorem; Syntactical concepts and their motivations; Kripke structures; Neighborhood structures;...

  • THE TRANSMISSION OF KNOWLEDGE. Welbourne, Michael // Philosophical Quarterly;Jan79, Vol. 29 Issue 114, p1 

    Comments on the idea that knowledge is transmissible. Mechanisms involved in the transmission of knowledge; Conditions for the successful transmission of knowledge; Role of belief in knowledge transmission; Transmission of knowledge through a chain of authorities;

  • The inescapability of Gettier problems. Zagzebski, Linda // Philosophical Quarterly;Jan94, Vol. 44 Issue 174, p65 

    Argues that it is not possible to avoid Gettier counter-examples given the assumption that the relation between justification and truth is close but not inviolable. Claim that either justified true beliefs are insufficient for knowledge or justification must be reconceived to make it...

  • How can I know I’ve perceived God? Mawson, T. // International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Apr2005, Vol. 57 Issue 2, p105 

    In this paper I argue that a necessary condition of one’s perceiving God is that an experience of the right phenomenological sort be caused in one ‘directly enough’ by God and - bypassing the issue of what is necessary for an experience to be of the right phenomenological...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics