TITLE

Dolby, Lucent In AC 3 Dispute

AUTHOR(S)
Palenchar, Joseph
PUB. DATE
March 2005
SOURCE
TWICE: This Week in Consumer Electronics;3/7/2005, Vol. 20 Issue 6, p6
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article reports on a patent-infringement lawsuit filed by Lucent against Dolby Labs in California in August 2002. The lawsuit filed by Lucent against Dolby could materially impact Dolby's licensing business and may seriously harm the financial condition and results operations, Dolby said in its prospectus. In August 2002, Lucent filed a suit claiming that products incorporating Dolby AC-3technology infringe on two Lucent patents and sought injunctive relief and unspecified damages, the prospectus says. The suit goes to a jury in April 2005 in San Jose, California.
ACCESSION #
16346938

 

Related Articles

  • Vicor sues Tyco over converter patent. Sperling, Ed // Electronic News;1/15/2007, Vol. 53 Issue 3, p44 

    The article reports on a lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts by VLT against Lucent and Tyco Electronics over patent infringement. According to the complaint, Lucent first developed technology that infringed on the patent, then sold its manufacturing operation to Tyco. The...

  • Into the Fray. Seidenberg, Steven // InsideCounsel;Dec2009, Vol. 20 Issue 216, p22 

    The article offers information on patent damages cases. According to Michael Albert, a shareholder at Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, the Lucent Technologies Inc. versus Gateway Inc. is one of the most important patent damages cases in the Federal Circuit as of December 1, 2009. Lucent won the case...

  • Lucent makes legal challenge. Kujubu, Laura // InfoWorld;06/29/98, Vol. 20 Issue 26, p60 

    Focuses on the patent infringement lawsuit filed by Lucent Technologies against Cisco Systems Inc.

  • Tiny Forex suit in Shanghai may have big ramifications for China traders. Wipperfurth, Heike // Investment Dealers' Digest;06/15/98, Vol. 64 Issue 24, p3 

    Presents information on a lawsuit filed by Credit Agricole Indosuez company against Lucent Technologies of Shanghai Limited. Circumstances surrounding the lawsuit; Information on settlement discussions; Who Credit Agricole retain as consultant in the lawsuit; When the lawsuit was filed.

  • Lucent Sues Micron Tech.  // Electronic News;07/05/99, Vol. 45 Issue 27, p2 

    Looks at a patent infringement lawsuit filed by Lucent Technologies Inc. against Micron Technology Inc. in the United States District Court in Wilmington, Delaware. What the patents in question cover; Other allegations against Micron.

  • Royalty Roulette. Foster, James J. // Inventors' Digest;Dec2010, Vol. 26 Issue 12, p35 

    The article focuses on how some court decisions since 2009 have controlled infringement payouts in the U.S. It notes that companies and inventors battling over royalties related to patent-infringement need to reconsider their strategy and tactics in response to recent court decisions. It recalls...

  • Ineffective patent proposal.  // Medical Device Technology;Oct2004, Vol. 15 Issue 8, p6 

    The article focuses on the Patents Bill currently before the Parliament of Great Britain, which is considered ineffective and may further deteriorate the condition of some companies. The current patent system favours large companies with deep pockets. The government of Great Britain has fudged...

  • MERCK & CO. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.  // Berkeley Technology Law Journal;Annual Review2006, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p184 

    The article presents a jurisprudence in relation to the issue of a patentee acting as his own lexicographer in the U.S. It discusses the case of Merck versus Teva, in which the controversy is focused on the term "about" that was used in the claim. Lastly, it explains the Federal Circuit ruling...

  • Design Standard Redefined. Maleske, Melissa // InsideCounsel;Nov2008, Vol. 18 Issue 204, p13 

    The article presents the decision of the 13-judge en banc panel for the Federal Circuit transforming the landscape of design patent law on September 22, 2008 ruling on the case "Egyptian Goddess versus Swisa." The decision unanimously rejected the decades-old "point of novelty" test for...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics