TITLE

Peirce: Underdetermination, Agnosticism, and Related Mistakes

AUTHOR(S)
Magnus, P. D.
PUB. DATE
February 2005
SOURCE
Inquiry;Feb2005, Vol. 48 Issue 1, p26
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
There are two ways that we might respond to the underdetermination of theory by data. One response, which we can call the agnostic response, is to suspend judgment: "Where scientific standards cannot guide us, we should believe nothing". Another response, which we can call the fideist response, is to believe whatever we would like to believe: "If science cannot speak to the question, then we may believe anything without science ever contradicting us". C.S. Peirce recognized these options and suggested evading the dilemma. It is a Logical Maxim, he suggests, that there could be no genuine underdetermination. This is no longer a viable option in the wake of developments in modern physics, so we must face the dilemma head on. The agnostic and fideist responses to underdetermination represent fundamentally different epistemic viewpoints. Nevertheless, the choice between them is not an unresolvable struggle between incommensurable worldviews. There are legitimate considerations tugging in each direction. Given the balance of these considerations, there should be a modest presumption of agnosticism. This may conflict with Peirce's Logical Maxim, but it preserves all that we can preserve of the Peircean motivation.
ACCESSION #
16295749

 

Related Articles

  • Background Beliefs Ideology, and Science. van der Meer, Jitse // Perspectives on Science & Christian Faith;Jun2013, Vol. 65 Issue 2, p87 

    The notion that not only facts but also personal and communal beliefs contribute to scientific knowledge has become commonplace. It raises two important questions. How can people with very different belief systems work together in science? Can scientific knowledge be trusted if it is shaped and...

  • Praemythic Beliefcraft. Nordstrom, Alan // Journal of Religion & Psychical Research;Oct2005, Vol. 28 Issue 4, p218 

    A discussion is presented on various aspects of believing including belief as a mode of knowing, a vehicle for knowing or a step toward knowing.

  • WHAT IS A SKEPTIC?  // Skeptic;2004, Vol. 10 Issue 4, p5 

    Discusses the definition of skepticism. Confusion of being a skeptic with cynic; Embodiment of the modern skepticism in the scientific method; History of skepticism dating back to ancient Greece with Socrates observations.

  • Contextualism, Externalism and Epistemic Standards. Williams, Michael // Philosophical Studies;Mar2001, Vol. 103 Issue 1, p1 

    Discusses an approach to knowledge called simple conversational contextualism (SCC). Belief of SCC proponents that it offers an account of both why skepticism is wrong and why arguments for skepticism are appealing; History and description of SCC; Argument that SCC is a shallow contextualism.

  • Las distancias del creer: secularización, idolatría y el pensamiento del otro. CAGÜEÑAS ROZO, DIEGO // Revista de Estudios Sociales;dic2009, Issue 34, p123 

    Is it necessary to believe what the other believes to understand him? This paper explores different perspectives through which anthropology has addressed this question. The main argument is that because it is a discipline that arose alongside modernity and the secularization of the world,...

  • The conflict between science and religion: a discussion on the possibilities for settlement. Eliane Brigida Morais Falcão // Cultural Studies of Science Education;Mar2010, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p47 

    In his article Skepticism, truth as coherence, and construtivist epistemology: grounds for resolving the discord between science and religion?, John Staver identifies what he considers to be the source of the conflicts between science and religion: the establishment of the relationship between...

  • Croire et savoir : La nouvelle incarnation. Pérez, Christophe // Caietele Echinox;Dec2009, Vol. 17, p9 

    In the eleventh century, Saint Anselme exerted a profound influence on the thought of the Middle Ages, through his intellectual attitude towards believing to understand (Credo ut intellegam). Until the seventeenth century, belief and knowledge were, indeed, intimately connected, and it would be...

  • Plantinga’s Reformed Epistemology: What’s the Question? Baker, Deane-Peter // International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Apr2005, Vol. 57 Issue 2, p77 

    Alvin Plantinga’sWarranted Christian Beliefis without questionone of the central texts of the Reformed epistemology movement. Critiques of Plantinga’s defence have been both multiple and varied. As varied as these responses are, however, it is my contention that many of them amount...

  • THE SEARCH FOR MEANING: THE WORD. STOCKTON, EUGENE // Compass (10369686);Summer2014, Vol. 48 Issue 4, p31 

    The author presents a reflection of the search for meaning, pursuit of the True, the Good and the Beautiful. Topics include patterns of the truth, psychology, biblical typology, and the Words of God. The author emphasizes that the True, Good and the Beautiful pertain to one God whom people are...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics