TITLE

External fixation versus locked intramedullary nailing in tibial shaft fractures: a prospective, randomised study of 78 patients

AUTHOR(S)
Bråten, Martinus; Helland, Per; Grøntvedt, Torbjørn; Aamodt, Arild; Benum, Pål; Mølster, Anders
PUB. DATE
February 2005
SOURCE
Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery;Feb2005, Vol. 125 Issue 1, p21
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Introduction We performed a prospective, randomised study to compare the Ex-fi-re external fixator (EF) with locked intramedullary (IM) nailing in tibial fractures. Only fractures without soft-tissue problems of importance were included. Materials and methods Ex-fi-re is a unilateral, dynamic axial fixator with fracture reduction capabilities. The Grosse-Kempf nail was used for nailing. A total of 78 patients with 79 fractures were entered in the study (41 Ex-fi-re, 38 IM nails). Results Time to radiographic union and full weight-bearing did not differ significantly, but unprotected weight-bearing was achieved earlier in the IM group (12 vs 20 weeks; p<0.001). There were more reoperations due to secondary dislocation in the EF group. There were no differences in final angulation or shortening. After 6 months and 1 year there were no differences in knee motion, ankle motion, fracture site pain or ankle pain. Some 64% of the nailed patients complained of anterior knee pain after 1 year. Conclusion The results were comparable in most respects. Unprotected weightbearing was achieved earlier after IM nailing. Anterior knee pain was frequent after nailing.
ACCESSION #
16183844

 

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics