TITLE

The Dialectical/Dialogical Structure of Ethical Reflection

AUTHOR(S)
Kelly, Michael
PUB. DATE
July 1989
SOURCE
Philosophy & Rhetoric;Summer1989, Vol. 22 Issue 3, p174
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article argues that ethical reflection has both a dialectical and a dialogical structure and, more specifically, that its structure is dialogical because it is dialectical. The overall intention is to develop a hermeneutic conception of the structure of ethical reflection. Ethical reflection has a dialogical structure because it has a dialectical structure. Ethical dialogue is both the investigation of the many conflicting tendencies within human practical reason and the attempt to discover ways of mediating them. The purpose of philosophical ethics is to analyze this dialectical/dialogical structure of ethical reflection, to provide guidance for the mediations it achieves between the different moments of this structure, and to establish criteria with which to conduct the critique of ethical practices. Just as the conflicts that shape practical reason are constantly taking on different forms, the dialogues in which these conflicts manifest themselves and become mediated are forever evolving, but always with the orientation toward solidarity with which they commenced.
ACCESSION #
16183106

 

Related Articles

  • Type of Argument and Argument Composition. Johnson, Amy Janan; Brown, Kenneth; Wittenberg, Elaine // Conference Proceedings -- National Communication Association/Ame;2003, Vol. 2, p577 

    The article presents a study on the role and potential of personal issue and public issue arguments in interpersonal relationship. It states that arguments in interpersonal relationship is divided into two types, such as the personal issue argument which emphasizes on behavior within the pair,...

  • Analyzing Structural Features of Informal Argument1. Suzuki, Shinobu // Conference Proceedings -- National Communication Association/Ame;2003, Vol. 2, p587 

    The article presents a study which formulates a framework which is responsible for describing several aspects of argument. It says that a method for coding argument with the use of mapping dyadic relationships among units is being proposed. Hence, the study the mapping of pair relationship...

  • Dialogic Characteristics of Philosophical Discourse: The Case of Plato's Dialogues. Cossutta, Frédéric // Philosophy & Rhetoric;2003, Vol. 36 Issue 1, p48 

    The article reports that the dialogic is increasingly acknowledged as a fundamental factor in the study of human language, a factor that transcends its explicit presence in dialogue. Karl Otto Apel is the examples of philosopher who does not think of the dialogic as subordinate to the monologic,...

  • Discourse-Oriented Pedagogy. Prasad, G. // Language in India;Oct2014, Vol. 14 Issue 10, p253 

    Teaching English as a second language calls for the attention of teachers with involvement, dedication and love for students. Language learning involves linking four skills-L, S, R and W. Teaching is an art and every teacher has a personal style and specific beliefs. To fulfil this, NCF 2005...

  • The Epistemological Function of Platonic Myth. Stewart, Robert Scott // Philosophy & Rhetoric;Fall1989, Vol. 22 Issue 4, p260 

    This article argues that Platonic myths function first as the rudimentary beginnings of the epistemic process whereby one changes from thinking in purely physical terms to conceptual ones and secondly, that myth serves as the medium through which is made possible any discussion of the first...

  • STORYTELLING AS A MODE OF MORAL ARGUMENT: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR FISHER. Gronbeck, Bruce E. // Conference Proceedings -- National Communication Association/Ame;1983 Argument in Transition, p463 

    The article presents a response to the discourse of Professor Fisher on narrative as a paradigm of moral argument. It disagrees that narrative is a paradigm of moral argument because argumentation and narrative are two distinct mental activities. While adequate argumentation depends upon...

  • Creating Places for Dialogic Argument in the National Conversation. Pearce, W. Barnett // Conference Proceedings -- National Communication Association/Ame;1995 Argumentation & Values, p242 

    The article discusses the creation of the Kaleidoscope Project and the Public Conversations Project as a response to the problem of improving the quality of public discourse in the U.S. The intention of the Kaleidoscope Project is to bring the features of conversation in public discourse. The...

  • Rhetoric and Moral Progress in Kant's Ethical Community. Stroud, Scott R. // Philosophy & Rhetoric;2005, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p328 

    The article focuses on the critical characterization of rhetoric and moral progress in Immanuel Kant's Ethical Community. The examination of the rhetoric of Kant's system highlights the problems on rhetoric manipulation. Kantian rhetoric allows for community to be closely connected to religious...

  • Restrictiveness, exclusivity, adversativity, and mirativity: Mandarin Chinese zhishi as an affective diminutive marker in spoken discourse. Wang, Yu-Fang; Tsai, Mei-Chi; Schams, Wayne; Yang, Chi-Ming // Chinese Language & Discourse;2013, Vol. 4 Issue 2, p181 

    Mandarin Chinese zhishi (similar to English 'only'), comprised of the adverb zhi and the copula shi, can act as an adverb (ADV) or a discourse marker (DM). This study analyzes the role of zhishi in spoken discourse, based on the methodological and theoretical principles of interactional...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics