TITLE

Federal Court Ruling

PUB. DATE
November 2004
SOURCE
Congressional Digest;Nov2004, Vol. 83 Issue 9, p269
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that on September 29, 2004, in a decision on American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) v. Ashcroft, a Federal court struck down Section 505 of the USA PATRIOT Act on the grounds that it violates free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the right to be free of unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment. The ACLU is also challenging the constitutionality of Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act. Both Section 215 and Section 505 eliminate the requirement that the FBI demonstrate "probable cause" before obtaining customer records; Section 505 focuses on electronic records.
ACCESSION #
15914695

 

Related Articles

  • ACLU tells state Supreme Court amendment too vague.  // Gay & Lesbian Times;9/30/2004, Issue 875, p34 

    Reports on the Supreme Court filing of the American Civil Liberties Union citing the proposed constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage as vague and misleading in Arkansas. Request for the removal of the item from the November 2 ballot; Defense of the state Attorney General's office to...

  • Global Anti-Anarchism: The Origins of Ideological Deportation and the Suppression of Expression. Kraut, Julia Rose // Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies;Winter2012, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p169 

    On September 6, 1901, a self-proclaimed anarchist named Leon Czolgosz fatally shot President William McKinley at the Pan-American Exposition in Buffalo, New York. This paper places the suppression of anarchists and the exclusion and deportation of foreigners in the aftermath of the ''shot that...

  • ACLU is right to defend Phelps. Rosendall, Richard J. // Bay Windows;8/17/2006, Vol. 24 Issue 35, p6 

    The author expresses support for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) regarding its lawsuit defending the right of the anti-gay Phelps clan to conduct demonstrations outside the funerals of American soldiers killed in Iraq. He pointed out that in the past, the ACLU has stood and defended a...

  • Free Speech, with Reservations. Broun, Heywood // New Republic;7/13/38, Vol. 95 Issue 1232, p278 

    Comments on the offer of the Civil Liberties Union to defend the writer Elizabeth Dilling in the U.S. Words of the philosopher Voltaire about free speech; Disputes in the interpretation of the freedom of speech; Views of the author about the slander charges against the writer; Devotion of the...

  • The Dilemma of the ACLU. Drinan, Robert F. // America;11/28/1959, Vol. 102 Issue 9, p271 

    The article focuses on the dilemma faced by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) in the U.S. in July 1958. It notes on the transformation of the Church-State panel of Free Speech Committee to a full Church-State Committee. The transformation aids the individuals from ACLU for a deliberation...

  • FLORIDA: 'Free Speech Zone' Challenged. Wockner, Rex // Just Out;7/6/2007, Vol. 24 Issue 17, p18 

    The article reports that the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida has sent a letter to the offices of Saint Petersburg Mayor Rick Baker and Police Chief Charles Harmon calling for changes to the city's controversial ordinance on free speech zone and event permit enforcement on June 25,...

  • The ACLU's Holy War.  // National Review;1/19/1979, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p74 

    The article reports on the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) campaign against the Hyde Amendment. The ACLU inspected Congressman Hyde's mail and followed him even when he went to attend a Catholic mass, in order to establish the unconstitutionality of the Amendment. ACLU executive director...

  • First Amendment Blues.  // Time;8/15/1977, Vol. 110 Issue 7, p48 

    The article focuses on the First Amendment principles which protect the civil rights marches in U.S. It is stated that the constitutional rights that protect the southern cities of U.S. in 1960s were not applicable in Chicago, Illinois in 1977. It cites the troubles between the black and white...

  • MINNESOTA: ACLU says First Amendment protects Craig's bathroom behavior.  // Gay & Lesbian Times;9/20/2007, Issue 1030, p24 

    The article reports on the court papers filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) which argues on bathroom behavior case of U.S. Senator Larry E. Craig. The ACLU argued that Craig's foot-tapping and hand movements in an airport bathroom amounted to speech protected by the First...

Share

Read the Article

Other Topics