TITLE

Sensitivity of Carbon Sequestration Costs to Economic and Biological Uncertainties

AUTHOR(S)
Capalbo, Susan M.; Antle, John M.; Mooney, Sian; Paustian, Keith
PUB. DATE
January 2004
SOURCE
Environmental Management;Jan2004 Supplement 1, Vol. 33, pS238
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Modifying current agricultural management practices as a means of sequestering carbon has been shown to be a relatively low cost way to offset greenhouse gas emissions. In this paper, we examine the sensitivity of the estimates of the amount of soil carbon sequestered and the costs of sequestering carbon to uncertainties in the underlying economic and biological parameters of the modeling framework and to scale of analysis. An application is made to the dryland grain production systems of the US northern Great Plains under a per-hectare payment policy. We show that the resulting changes in the marginal costs and corresponding quantities of soil carbon sequestered are a nonlinear function of the changes in the soil carbon rates, yields, or economic parameters, and depend upon the spatial heterogeneity of the area. The analysis of changes in yields supports the argument that sequestering soil C could be a long-term win-win situation for producers and society. In the short run, providing incentives to producers to switch production practices in order to sequester soil C could lead to higher productivity in the long run that would induce farmers to maintain these practices without incentives.
ACCESSION #
15415250

 

Related Articles

  • Land-Use Change, Carbon Sequestration and Poverty Alleviation Land-Use Change, Carbon Sequestration, Poverty Alleviation. Lipper, Leslie; Cavatassi, Romina // Environmental Management;Jan2004 Supplement 1, Vol. 33, pS374 

    In this article, we seek to identify where the greatest potential for synergies between carbon sequestration and poverty alleviation lie and ways they can be enhanced. We assess the amount and eligibility criteria of sequestration payment sources to developing countries. Many land-use changes...

  • An evaluation of the century model to predict soil organic carbon: examples from Costa Rica and Canada. Oelbermann, Maren; Voroney, R. P. // Agroforestry Systems;May2011, Vol. 82 Issue 1, p37 

    Greater organic matter inputs in agroforestry systems contribute to the long-term storage of carbon (C) in the soil, and the use of simulation models provides an opportunity to evaluate the dynamics of the long-term trends of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in these systems. The objective of...

  • Effects of land-use-change scenarios on terrestrial carbon stocks in South Korea. Lee, Dong; Park, Chan; Tomlin, Dana // Landscape & Ecological Engineering;Jan2015, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p47 

    The amount of carbon stored in soil and vegetation varies according to land use. Land-use changes (LUCs) affect those carbon stocks. Changes in carbon stocks also affect greenhouse gas emissions. Predicting LUCs is therefore necessary to establish quantitative targets for carbon dioxide (CO)...

  • Soil carbon stock increases in the organic layer of boreal middle-aged stands. Häkkinen, M. // Biogeosciences Discussions;2011, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p1015 

    Changes in the soil carbon stock can potentially have a large influence on global carbon balance between terrestrial ecosystems and atmosphere. Since carbon sequestration of forest soils is influenced by human activities, reporting of the soil carbon pool is a compulsory part of the national...

  • Carbon Sequestration in Soil with Consideration of CO2 Emissions from Production Inputs: An Economic Analysis. Williams, Jeffery R.; Nelson, Richard G.; Claassen, Mark M.; Rice, Charles W. // Environmental Management;Jan2004 Supplement 1, Vol. 33, pS264 

    An economic analysis of wheat and grain sorghum production systems that affect carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and sequester soil carbon (C) in metric tons (MT) is conducted. Expected net returns, changes in net C sequestered, and the value of C credits necessary to equate net returns from...

  • Carbon Source Quality and Placement Effects on Soil Organic Carbon Status. Wienhold, B.; Varvel, G.; Johnson, J.; Wilhelm, W. // BioEnergy Research;Jun2013, Vol. 6 Issue 2, p786 

    Improved management of agricultural soils has potential for sequestering carbon (C) and reducing the accumulation of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Development of management practices to increase C sequestration is dependent on improved understanding of soil processes influencing long-term storage...

  • Cover Image, Volume 7, Issue 3. Zhang, Liwei; Parthasarathy, Hariprasad; Karamalidis, Athanasios // Greenhouse Gases: Science & Technology;Jun2017, Vol. 7 Issue 3, pi 

    The cover image, by Liwei Zhang et al., is based on the Original Research Article Investigation on arsenopyrite dissolution and As (III) migration under geologic carbon storage conditions: A numerical simulation approach, DOI:10.1002/ghg.1651. Design Credit: Tim J. Kelly, Carnegie Mellon...

  • Contents.  // Greenhouse Gases: Science & Technology;Jun2017, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p395 

    No abstract available.

  • Graphically Speaking. Antle, John; Capalbo, Susan; Mooney, Sian // Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm & Resource Issues;Fall2002, Vol. 17 Issue 3, p24 

    Discusses carbon sequestration in agricultural soils as a way to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. Average annual rate of carbon accumulation for selected crop system changes that increase biomass; Data on supply of carbon; Proportion of eligible land area entering a carbon payment program.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics