TITLE

Money, Taxes, Public Spending, and the State Within a Circuitist Perspective

AUTHOR(S)
Bougrine, Hassan; Seccareccia, Mario
PUB. DATE
September 2002
SOURCE
International Journal of Political Economy;Fall2002, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p58
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses money, taxes, public spending, and the states within a circuitist perspective. Economic theory is plagued with a serious misunderstanding of the role, nature, and meaning of money, taxes, and debt. The belief that taxes are a source of government revenue and that they can finance social programs is a fallacy that has dominated economic reasoning in academic and policy circles for a long time. As a consequence, it is widely accepted that, as a rule, government spending must be constrained by the limited financial resources it is able to raise from taxation. The analysis has shown that, contrary to common belief, taxes are part of a reflux phase in the monetary circuit and that, as such, and they are destroying money, not creating it. It follows that, logically, taxes cannot pay for public sector spending. Understanding the role of taxes within this circuitist framework is essential because it effectively liberates the government from being subject to an artificial, self-imposed budget constraint and, therefore, allows it actively to intervene and fill the gap of underutilized capacity of society as a whole, that is, strive to achieve full employment. Therefore, objections to tax cuts can only be justified if the government is at the same time pursuing a balanced budget policy, that is, reducing its spending in order to balance the books, and if these cuts are not part of a progressive tax structure.
ACCESSION #
14781106

 

Related Articles

  • THE GENERAL REVENUE EFFECTS OF THE CALIFORNIA PROPERTY TAX LIMITATION AMENDMENT: A COMMENT. Vasch�, Jon David // National Tax Journal;Dec78, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p399 

    This article presents an analysis of the general revenue effects of Proposition 13 in California by Perry Shapiro and Douglas Morgan appeared in the June 1978 issue of the �National Tax Journal.� The study indicates that examination of tax policy must account for the mutual...

  • When Is the Debt a Burden? Jordan, Jerry L. // Fraser Forum;Aug2004, p21 

    The amount spent annually by the government reflects a real burden, but whether to finance such spending by borrowing versus taxing is not the critical issue. Since the amount any government spends represents whatever burden is created, one sure way to lessen the burden would be to spend less....

  • Debt means nothing unless you compare it to income, wealth. Sowell, Thomas // Enterprise/Salt Lake City;12/6/2004, Vol. 34 Issue 24, p12 

    Argues against the need for increasing the taxes in the U.S. in 2004 in order to lower the national debt. Significance of reducing the rate of increase in government spending to tax revenues; Purpose of taxes; Ways to reduce the national debt.

  • Olympic land deal escapes government spending axe. Townsend, Sarah; Sprinks, Jennifer // Regeneration & Renewal;6/28/2010, p10 

    The article reports on the potential of a deal to survive the latest round of public spending cuts in London, England. It notes that the deal is for the Labour ministers to pay off 438 million pounds of debt. It was supposedly intended for companies that were charged with managing the...

  • Collaboration Demanded, Lest State Be Damned.  // Grand Rapids Business Journal;2/12/2007, Vol. 25 Issue 7, p4 

    The article comments on the agenda for spending and taxation in Michigan for 2007. It argues that the call for reduction in government spending is as useless as the demand for tax increase. It asserts that the issue of consolidations must be included in the discussion of savings. It urges...

  • Understanding State Budget Troubles. Daly, Mary // FRBSF Economic Letter;8/15/2003, Vol. 2003 Issue 23, p1 

    Reports on the struggle of lawmakers to bring state and local spending back in line with revenues in the U.S. Growth on spending; Spending commitments in excess of revenue flows; Inability to fund budgeted spending.

  • 'Are Nonresidents Contributing Their Share to Core City Revenues?': A Comment. Ziegler, Joseph A.; Dyer, Carl L. // Land Economics;Feb75, Vol. 51 Issue 1, p98 

    The article focuses on the contribution of nonresidents' share to core city revenues. In one of his articles, professor R.S. Smith raises the question whether nonresidents contribute their share to core city revenues and concluded that in the case of San Francisco metropolitan area at least, the...

  • New York tops the list in state and local taxes, study finds.  // Westchester County Business Journal;8/2/2004, Vol. 43 Issue 31, p17 

    Reports on the combined state and local taxes in New York. Imposition of state-level tax increase by the Legislature; Estimation of the state and local debt; Escalation of government spending levels.

  • Highway Robbery? Funding Transportation Spending in Canada. Clemens, Jason; Godin, Keith; Veldhuis, Niels // Fraser Forum;Nov2004, p4 

    This article focuses on the fundamental disconnect between governments that raise transportation-specific taxes and those that actually spend money on transportation in the U.S. The imbalance has become a contentious political issue as municipalities are facing tremendous pressure to spend even...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics