TITLE

Congress' attacks on world court put the U.S. above law

AUTHOR(S)
Zunes, Stephen
PUB. DATE
October 2004
SOURCE
National Catholic Reporter;10/15/2004, Vol. 40 Issue 44, p17
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that the International Court of Justice (ICJ) of the United Nations has determined that the Israeli government's construction of a separation wall running through the occupied Palestinian West Bank was illegal. Determination of the U.S. house of representatives to deplore the court's decision; Anticipation of the ICJ of the tragic realities of terrorist attacks against Israel; Declaration of the ICJ that a separation barrier has to be built along Israel's recognized border; Comments of the U.S. congress from both parties on the foundation of the ruling.
ACCESSION #
14707362

 

Related Articles

  • THE BINDING DILEMMA: FROM BAKASSI TO BADME--MAKING STATES COMPLY WITH TERRITORIAL DECISIONS OF INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL BODIES. Jibril, Nejib // American University International Law Review;2004, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p633 

    Analyzes the differences between the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary Commission (EEBC) in their ability to bind countries under their jurisdiction to their decisions. Background of the border disputes involving Nigeria and Cameroon and Eritrea and...

  • International Court of Justice.  // International Organization;Autumn62, Vol. 16 Issue 4, p865 

    The United Nations International Court of Justice has made its judgment to several cases in 1962. On July 20, the Court has delivered an advisory opinion on the question of certain expenses of the United Nations. On August 7, the President of the Court has fixed the time limits for the filing of...

  • CASE CONCERNING SOVEREIGNTY OVER PEDRA BRANCA/PULAU BATU PUTEH, MIDDLE ROCKS AND SOUTH LEDGE (MALAYSIA/SINGAPORE). TAN HSIEN-LI // Singapore Year Book of International Law;2008, Vol. 12, p257 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the International Court of Justice (ICJ) awarded the island of Pedra Branca to Singapore in a territorial dispute between Singapore and Malaysia involving the marine features of Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks, and South Ledge. The ruling,...

  • Presentation before the International Court of Justice: Nicaragua v. United States. McDougal, Myres // World Affairs;Summer85, Vol. 148 Issue 1, p35 

    Deals with the issue of whether a State may modify the terms of its acceptance of the International Court of Justice's compulsory jurisdiction before another State has filed an application against it. Contention of the United States and Nicaragua; Different assumptions about the legal nature of...

  • Reflections of the State Department on the U.S. and the World Court.  // World Affairs;Summer85, Vol. 148 Issue 1, p53 

    Highlights the observations of the U.S. State Department on the International Court of Justice's judgments in November 26, 1984 on jurisdiction and admissibility in the case of Nicaragua versus United States of America. Evidence and law relevant to the issues before the Court; Court's finding...

  • BAHRAIN.  // MEED: Middle East Economic Digest;4/28/2000, Vol. 44 Issue 17, p17 

    Reports that the International Court of Justice is opening formal hearings into the border dispute between Bahrain and Qatar on May 29, 2000.

  • THE PROCEDURE FOLLOWED BY THE COURT.  // Congressional Digest;Jan1961, Vol. 40 Issue 1, p5 

    Focuses on administrative procedures followed in the United Nations International Court of Justice. Procedure for the election of judges; Procedure for the jurisdiction of cases; Conditions to make an application for the revision of justice.

  • THE SCOPE OF COMPULSORY JURISDICTION.  // Congressional Digest;Jan1961, Vol. 40 Issue 1, p6 

    Focuses on the scope of compulsory jurisdiction of the United Nations International Court of Justice. Clauses of the Article 36 of the Statute; Nations recognizing compulsory jurisdiction; Nations with 'Self-Judging clauses.

  • NIGERIA: Bad losers? Not quite. Jason, Pini // New African;Dec2002, Issue 413, p20 

    Reports that people from all walks of life in Nigeria have strongly opposed the decision of the United Nations International Court of Justice (ICJ) that Bakassi Peninsula belonged to Cameroon and not Nigeria. Official statement issued by the Nigerian government on October 23, 2002 rejecting the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics