TITLE

Reserving the Kill: The Suicide Ban and Criminal Punishment in Code-Era Hollywood Film

AUTHOR(S)
Sligar, Sara
PUB. DATE
December 2019
SOURCE
Film History;Winter2019, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
During the 1930s and 1940s, the Production Code Administration systematically censored cinematic representations of criminals "escaping justice" through suicide, instead forcing studios to conclude films with scenes of police arrest and allusions to future trials. Instituted in consultation with police officials, the suicide ban emerged as the American criminal justice system was rapidly shifting to an institutionalized, sociological model. Rereading the averted-suicide ending of Crime Without Passion (1934) as a manifesto on the appropriate death of the accused, I argue that the suicide prohibition, which proved uniquely resistant to ironic subversion, became a powerful tool for consolidating state authority over criminal punishment.
ACCESSION #
141514926

 

Related Articles

  • The Death Penalty. van den Haag, Ernest; Schwarzschild, Henry // ABA Journal;Apr85, Vol. 71 Issue 4, p38 

    Features views opposing or supporting death penalty in the United States. Constitutional provisions consistent with death penalty; State's arrogation of God-like wisdom to decide who should live and who should die; Deterrent effect of death penalty; Argument of social utility; Exemplary effect...

  • FINAL JUSTICE. Hansen, Mark // ABA Journal;Mar1992, Vol. 78 Issue 3, p64 

    Discusses key legal issues relevant to capital punishment in the U.S. Weaknesses of the criminal law system exposed by legal cases on death penalty; Pros and cons of capital punishment; Policy implications on the justice system.

  • Cheaper to kill? Quade, Vicki // ABA Journal;Apr85, Vol. 71 Issue 4, p17 

    Cites the goal of a special committee of the American Bar Association to study death penalty cost in the United States and to recommend whether the death penalty should be expanded to crimes besides murder. Body of literature suggesting that death penalty is extremely expensive; Prosecution...

  • LawPoll. Reskin, Lauren Rubenstein // ABA Journal;Apr85, Vol. 71 Issue 4, p44 

    Discusses a LawPoll survey which showed that majority of United States lawyers favor the carrying out of capital punishment sentences already imposed by the courts. Growth of general public's support for death penalty since 1936; Results of Gallup Poll in 1981 regarding the issue; Strongest...

  • When innocence gets short shrift. Pendleton, Scott // Christian Science Monitor;6/26/95, Vol. 87 Issue 147, p9 

    Part II. Reviews the legal scenario in the perspective of the federal crime bill that attaches death penalty to 52 offenses and chokes off avenues of appeal. Allegations of breaking the law against prosecutors to win a capital case; Reversal of the conviction and capital punishment of Curtis...

  • It's time to work together. Ide III, R. William // ABA Journal;Feb94, Vol. 80 Issue 2, p8 

    Reflects the authors view on the reforms discussed in the civil justice system sponsored by the American Bar Association. Participants in the workshop; Focusing the attention on the crime and violence in the streets; Application of great determination to make the civil justice system more...

  • Seek solutions at all levels of society. Cleaver II, Emanuel // ABA Journal;May94, Vol. 80 Issue 5, p82 

    Discusses the key problems associated with America's criminal justice system. Collaboration of the executive, legislative and judicial branch of the government with the private sector; Involvement of every levels of society. INSET: Counties need more justice funding, too..

  • Taking the caseload crisis. Clifford Wallace, J. // ABA Journal;Jun94, Vol. 80 Issue 6, p88 

    Focuses on the implications of the increase in criminal cases filed in the federal district courts. Effect of expanded roles and increased caseloads for the federal courts; Mission of the federal court system.

  • Is there any help for the Widow's Son? Farid, Mujahid // New York Amsterdam News;7/9/94, Vol. 85 Issue 28, p13 

    Opinion. Comments on legislation concerning the administration of criminal justice in the United States. Provisions of the `three strikes you're out' legislation; Severe penalties meted out for non-Caucasian offenders of the law; Fallacies in determinism.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics