TITLE

A BIT OF CLARITY FROM THE COURT

AUTHOR(S)
Cannon, Angie
PUB. DATE
July 2004
SOURCE
U.S. News & World Report;7/12/2004, Vol. 137 Issue 1, p36
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that gives suspected terrorists access to U.S. courts. Admission that President Bush has the right to detain enemy combatants in the war on terrorism; Anticipation that there will be a blizzard of legal motions on behalf of 600 prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba and several detainees in South Carolina.
ACCESSION #
13644150

 

Related Articles

  • Geneva Conventions Should Not Be a Suicide Pact. Franc, Mike // Human Events;9/25/2006, Vol. 62 Issue 32, p10 

    The article comments on the plan of the U.S. Congress to extend the protections accorded to prisoners of war under the Geneva Conventions to suspected terrorist war criminals. The proposal would enable terrorist groups to share intelligence information. Among the Republican senators who support...

  • MILITARY TRIBUNALS IN THE UNITED STATES. Weisenmiller, Mark // History Today;Apr2002, Vol. 52 Issue 4, p28 

    Investigates the link between the fate of al-Qaida and Taliban prisoners to a U.S. Supreme Court decision in 1942. Case filed against captured Germans who failed to sabotage industrial installations; Overview of a military tribunal trial on the accused; Execution of the German saboteurs.

  • Can judges restore America's honour? Cohen, Nick // New Statesman;5/24/2004, Vol. 133 Issue 4689, p23 

    Focuses on a U.S. Supreme Court case that will decide if the Guantanamo Bay prisoners will be treated as prisoners of war and be covered by the Geneva Conventions. View that the case will have an impact on whether torture will be allowed to continue and if the detainees can seek legal redress;...

  • The Guantánamo Fallout. Isikoff, Michael; Taylor Jr., Stuart; Klaidman, Daniel // Newsweek (Pacific Edition);7/17/2006 (Pacific Edition), Vol. 148 Issue 3, p30 

    This article focuses on a U.S. Supreme Court decision blocking U.S. President George W. Bush and the Dept. of Defense's plans to try enemy combatants at Guantanamo Bay as war criminals in a military commission authorized by the President. In his majority opinion, Justice John Paul Stevens...

  • The Guantánamo Fallout. Isikoff, Michael; Taylor Jr., Stuart; Klaidman, Daniel // Newsweek (Atlantic Edition);7/17/2006 (Atlantic Edition), Vol. 148 Issue 3, p30 

    This article focuses on a U.S. Supreme Court decision blocking U.S. President George W. Bush and the Dept. of Defense's plans to try enemy combatants at Guantanamo Bay as war criminals in a military commission authorized by the President. In his majority opinion, Justice John Paul Stevens...

  • NCC joins in brief on prison detainees.  // Christian Century;2/10/2004, Vol. 121 Issue 3, p15 

    Reports on the decision of the National Council of Churches (NCC) to join a friend of the court brief at the U.S. Supreme Court supporting the legal rights of suspected terrorist detainees in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on...

  • THE DETENTION OF AL-QAEDA SUSPECTS AT GUANTANAMO BAY: UNITED KINGDOM PERSPECTIVES. Happold, Matthew // Human Rights Law Review;Jan2004, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p57 

    This article discusses reactions by the British Government to the detainment of alleged Taliban and Al-Qaeda terrorist organization members at the U.S. military base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Topics include the U.S. policy announcement that the detainees were not entitled to prisoner of war (PoW)...

  • The Law of War after the DTA, Hamdan and the MCA. Jackson, Dick; Jensen, Eric T.; Matsuishi, Robert // Army Lawyer;Sep2007, Issue 412, p19 

    The article discusses four particular aspects of recent events in the U.S. that have potentially fundamental impacts on the low of war (LOW). These four include the Supreme Court's ruling in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld case, the amendment to the War Crimes Act, the Detainee Treatment Act, and the...

  • Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project.  // Background Information Summaries;7/9/2010, p3 

    The U.S. Supreme Court upheld, in June 2010, the government's right to bar giving advice to designated terrorist organizations, including advice on how to negotiate peacefully. In the case of Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project (and its mirror, Humanitarian Law Project v. Holder), the justices...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics