New EPA rule could boost air pollution

January 2004
State Government News;Jan2004, Vol. 47 Issue 1, p10
Focuses on a new rule issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that would govern air emissions from old industry plants in the U.S. as of January 2004. Effect of the new rule on the New Source Review provision of the Clean Air Act which requires the installation of modern pollution controls by older power plants; Provision under the new rule; Reason for the increase in air pollution based on the study of emissions and permitting data obtained from state agencies in the U.S.


Related Articles

  • MACT - NESHAPs Historical Review. Sajedi, Sarah; O'Lochlainn, Ross // Pollution Engineering;Dec2010, Vol. 42 Issue 12, p13 

    The article focuses on the Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to eliminate hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) emissions. It says that the standard from the MACT approach is the National Emission Standards for Hazardous...

  • EPA Final Rule on Motorcycle Emissions.  // Professional Safety;Mar2004, Vol. 49 Issue 3, p54 

    Reports that Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has adopted revised exhaust emission standards for current regulated highway motorcycles. Expectations of EPA from manufacturers; Possible effect of the regulation on fuel cost savings; Effectivity of the rule.

  • 'Squeaky Wheels' Get Regulatory Relief.  // Products Finishing;Jul2007, Vol. 71 Issue 10, p8 

    The article reports on the implementation of the National Air Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Halogenated Solvent Cleaning, also known as HAP II, which is formulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The standards will set facility-wide emissions limits for several solvents that...

  • Too much or not enough? Geiselman, Bruce // Waste News;1/2/2006, Vol. 11 Issue 19, p3 

    The article reports that plans by federal regulators in the U.S. to revise air quality standards for particle pollution could require some power plant operators to take further emission reduction steps. However, the changes could be good news for farmers and mine operators concerned about...

  • The long road to Tier 4. Lustig, David // Railway Gazette International;Oct2012, Vol. 168 Issue 10, p25 

    The article discusses preparation being done by the railroad sector prior to the implementation of Tier 4 emissions standards by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The regulation which would take effect in January 2015 will require reduction of particulate emissions by 70 percent....

  • Decision on Clean Air Standards Pits the Issue of Health Versus the Issue of Cost. Mack, Debbi // Corporate Legal Times;Feb2000, Vol. 10 Issue 99, p76 

    Examines the significance of the Washington, D.C. Circuit Court's decision on the authority of the United States Environmental Protection Agency to enforce Clean Air Act 1990 rules. Proposal of revised national ambient air quality standards; Difficulty of regulating ozone and particulate...

  • ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.  // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;12/11/2012, Vol. 77 Issue 238, p73560 

    The article presents a proposed rule to approve and promulgate the air quality implementation plans of West Virginia issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It states that the agency has proposed the rule to approve a redesignation request and State Implementation Plan (SIP)...

  • Bad Air Days. Reese, April // E: The Environmental Magazine;Nov/Dec99, Vol. 10 Issue 6, p28 

    Discusses air pollution in the United States. Details on deaths linked to air pollution in different parts of the world; Number of people in the US who breathe unhealthy air according to US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); Top provision of the Clean Air Act, 1970; Reasons EPA drafted a...

  • Right Data. Rubenstein, Ed // National Review;7/14/1997, Vol. 49 Issue 13, p18 

    The article comments on the intention of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to tighten air-quality standards for ozone by one-third. The agency also proposes prohibiting tiny airborne particles, or soot airborne particles smaller than the particles regulated under the Clean Air Act....


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics