Bachenheimer, Joan F.
April 2004
Applied Clinical Trials;Apr2004, Vol. 13 Issue 4, p56
Academic Journal
Focuses on the significance of adopting good recruitment practice (GRP) principles to provide an effective means of cultivating a positive dynamic and productive relationship between site staff and subjects of clinical trials. Goal of GRP; Promotion of awareness and education about clinical research; Approach to address informed consent. INSET: Why We Need GRP.


Related Articles

  • For Phase I Studies, Ethical and Practical Concerns Abound. Benowitz, Steven // JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute;9/15/2004, Vol. 96 Issue 18, p1353 

    Focuses on bioethical principles to be considered in phase I clinical trials in the United States. Patients' perception of phase I clinical studies; Informed consent; Selective nature of patient population in phase I studies.

  • Discussion of Patient Recruitment and the Informed Consent Process in Clinical Drug Trials. White, Jerolee; Dutka, Paula // Nephrology Nursing Journal;May/Jun2005, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p354 

    Discusses issues concerning patient recruitment and the informed consent process in clinical drug trials in the U.S. as of May 2005. Details of clinical trial guidelines formulated at the 1996 International Conference on Harmonization; Concerns on the validity of patients' consent;...

  • Hope goes on trial. Brink, Susan // U.S. News & World Report;1/14/2002, Vol. 132 Issue 1, p51 

    Discusses informed consent among participants of medical clinical trials. Confusion among participants who do not understand that experiments may not be designed to help them but to develop future treatments; How confusion results from a lack of information regarding the trial; Mention of...

  • Pediatric clinical trials: a US perspective. Oelstrom, Matthew J.; Hoover-Regan, Margo L. // Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials;2014, Vol. 6, p127 

    Background: Since the scientific revolution, systematic child-subject experimentation has evolved, with regard not only to scientific methodology but also to appreciation of the vulnerability of pediatric subjects. Permission-assent or informed consent policies serve to protect pediatric...

  • Patients' experiences of intervention trials on the treatment of myocardial infarction: is it time to adjust the informed consent procedure to the patient's capacity? Ågård, A.; Hermerén, G.; Herlitz, J. // Heart;Dec2001, Vol. 86 Issue 6, p632 

    Objective: To investigate how patients included in trials on treatment in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction experience the consent procedure. Design: A combined qualitative and quantitative interview concerning the patients' knowledge of the trial, their feelings about being asked...

  • Trial patients often misunderstand consent forms.  // Nursing Standard;8/18/2004, Vol. 18 Issue 49, p8 

    Reports on the outcomes of a research by Cate O'Kane and colleagues showing that patients who give their consent to taking part in clinical trials often have little understanding of what they are signing. Evidence of low level of understanding of the treatment they were to receive during the...

  • You say Potato, I Say Potatah. Hindin, Toby Jane // Applied Clinical Trials;Apr2004, Vol. 13 Issue 4, p12 

    Focuses on the issue of subject recruitment in the clinical trials community in the U.S. Distinction between patients and subjects; Means of improving the forms of informed consent; Cause for delay in moving a clinical trial forward.

  • Third-World BARRIERS. Mueller, Jenny; Scheflenberg, David; Owens, Stephen // Applied Clinical Trials;Oct2007, Vol. 16 Issue 10, p58 

    The article discusses issues concerning the applicability of Good Clinical Practice (GCP) in third -world countries. It explores these issues in the context of studies carried out in sub-Saharan Africa. It addresses ethical concerns surrounding informed consent, vulnerability of study...

  • Commentary: an imperfect compromise. Dennis, Martin // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);8/2/2003, Vol. 327 Issue 7409, p286 

    Presents a commentary on the article "Modified informed consent procedure: consent to postponed information," by Boter et al in this issue. Their proposed compromise to obtaining fully informed consent before enrollment for randomised trials which makes blinding impossible and bias likely;...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics