TITLE

Are companies people?

AUTHOR(S)
Kinsley, Michael
PUB. DATE
May 1990
SOURCE
New Republic;5/7/90, Vol. 202 Issue 19, p6
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Comments on the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling that states may forbid corporations to spend money in support of political candidates. Argument that corporations are not people; Ruling that corporations enjoy certain economic advantages conferred by the state; Limitation of the political role of corporations.
ACCESSION #
12031897

 

Related Articles

  • Are companies people? Kinsley, Michael // New Republic;5/7/90, Vol. 202 Issue 19, p6 

    Comments on the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling that states may forbid corporations to spend money in support of political candidates. Argument that corporations are not people; Ruling that corporations enjoy certain economic advantages conferred by the state; Limitation of the political role of...

  • Supreme Court Overturns Campaign Finance Laws. Fishman, Mikkel // Moderate Voice;1/21/2010, p16 

    The article presents views from several readers regarding the decision of the Supreme Court to cancel restrictions on campaign funds from corporations in the U.S. According to one reader that corporate entities already have more power over government with respect to the current Supreme Court...

  • No Limits. Guiniven, John // Public Relations Strategist;Spring2010, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p44 

    The article discusses the impact of the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the First Amendment on corporations. The author explains that the ruling has eliminated most campaign spending limits of corporations. John Mims of Altyris Advertising & Public Relations points out that the ruling will...

  • MANCHURIAN CANDIDATES. Palast, Greg // Progressive Populist;2/15/2010, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p12 

    The article focuses on the ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court on the permission for corporations to support candidates in the elections with no limit. It says that corporations as natural persons, can contribute to campaigns, wherein they can give money through political action committees (PACs)....

  • Biz, nonprofits can be bigger players in candidate ads. Halcom, Chad // Crain's Detroit Business;1/25/2010, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p3 

    The article reports on a new ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court easing restrictions on corporate spending in election campaigns. Under the ruling, corporations and nonprofit organizations could make corporate independent expenditures and help promote political candidates, that was previously...

  • Closing Statement Greening the Elections. Carothers, Leslie // Environmental Forum;Jan/Feb2011, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p56 

    The article offers the author's insights on the 2010 election in California. She says that the Citizen United rule from the U.S. Supreme Court, which allows money spending for and against candidates' activities, implies bought lawmakers' position. She mentions on the corporations' resources...

  • U.S. Supreme Court to review Arizona Clean Elections law. Richey, Warren // Inside Tucson Business;12/3/2010, Vol. 20 Issue 27, p10 

    The article reports on the move of the U.S. Supreme Court (SC) to examine the constitutionality of the Clean Elections Act in Arizona. It states that SC will review the state's program that provides state money to certain candidates when their opponents exceeds government-set campaign spending...

  • DOES MONEY STILL TALK? Halloran, Liz // U.S. News & World Report;2/27/2006, Vol. 140 Issue 7, p30 

    This article discusses the upcoming case before the U.S. Supreme Court that will determine the constitutionality of a Vermont Law that limits how much a political candidate can spend on a campaign. The court will also be indirectly reviewing a previous decision in Buckley v. Valeo that allows...

  • Freedom of Speech Now Illegal. Roane, Spencer // American Spectator;Feb2004, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p10 

    Discusses the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, a campaign finance reform in the U.S. Provisions of the legislation; Details of the soft money reforms approved by the U.S. Supreme Court; Implications of the law for the political candidates.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics