TITLE

Two Cheers for Forgiveness (and Even Fewer for Revenge)

AUTHOR(S)
Hughes, Paul
PUB. DATE
June 2016
SOURCE
Philosophia;Jun2016, Vol. 44 Issue 2, p361
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In this paper I critically discuss what has come to be known as the consensus or standard view of interpersonal forgiveness noting some of the paradoxes it appears to generate, how its conceptual resources seem unable to help illuminate several other varieties of forgiveness that are either themselves instances of interpersonal forgiving or at least types of forgiveness that a theory of interpersonal forgiveness should be able to shed some light upon. In the final section I offer some remarks on the nature of revenge, which has recently come to be seen by some philosophers as a morally acceptable alternative to forgiving wrongdoers, note some of the puzzles to which it gives rise, and conclude that while both types of responses to wrongdoers remain morally complex, there is good reason to think that forgiveness is the morally more appropriate response to having been wronged.
ACCESSION #
117417554

 

Related Articles

  • The 78th time. Camille, Alice // U.S. Catholic;Sep2005, Vol. 70 Issue 9, p41 

    Focuses on forgiveness in the Christian context. Experience with wanting to break the cycle of a friend's insensitivity and be able to forgive; Justification for not resorting to revenge; Illustration of the forgiveness extended by God to sinners.

  • Two arguments against the punishment-forbearance account of forgiveness. Warmke, Brandon // Philosophical Studies;Oct2013, Vol. 165 Issue 3, p915 

    One account of forgiveness claims that to forgive is to forbear punishment. Call this the Punishment-Forbearance Account of forgiveness. In this paper I argue that forbearing punishment is neither necessary nor sufficient for forgiveness.

  • RETRIBUTION, RESTITUTION AND REVENGE. Klimchuk, Dennis // Law & Philosophy;Jan2001, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p81 

    The article discusses the concepts of retribution, restitution, and revenge. Critics of retributivism often complain that retributivists substitute metaphor for argument just when the questions become difficult. Principal among these are metaphors of commerce. Retributive ideas are often cashed...

  • Revenge as the Dark Double of Retributive Punishment. Kaufman, Whitley // Philosophia;Jun2016, Vol. 44 Issue 2, p317 

    It is an assumption widely shared by both retributivists and anti-retributivists that revenge is a morally impermissible basis for inflicting harm. Retributivists have thus exercised great ingenuity in demonstrating that retribution is fundamentally different from revenge. But this is, I argue,...

  • Feature. Connolly, Diane // Science & Spirit;Jan/Feb2008, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p30 

    The article reports on the findings of researchers about how to trigger forgiveness instead of revenge when a person gets hurt. Forgiveness has a proven power to transform individuals and their relationships. The research identified what makes people forgive so that these practices can be put in...

  • The Real Roots of Vengeance and Forgiveness. McCullough, Michael E. // Spirituality & Health;2014 Soul/Body Connection, p18 

    The article offers perspective on vengeance and forgiveness. Some factors contributing to revenge as a disease include poor psychological constitution or bad childhood. Symptoms exhibited by people who have been prevented to exercise their vengeful impulses include headaches, stomachaches,...

  • REVENGE.  // Shamans & Kushakas;1991, p59 

    This article presents the short story "Revenge."

  • Introduction to Ethics of Forgiveness and Revenge. Scheiter, Krisanna // Philosophia;Jun2016, Vol. 44 Issue 2, p313 

    The papers collected in this volume were first presented at a workshop entitled Ethics of Forgiveness and Revenge, which was held May 22-23, 2014 at Union College in Schenectady, New York. The papers cover a range of topics, including the rightness and wrongness of vengeance and forgiveness, who...

  • No keeping score.  // Christian Century;01/31/2001, Vol. 118 Issue 4, p11 

    Discusses the retaliatory response to an injury received. Ethics of the kingdom; Lesson from Joseph in the Bible; What victims must rediscover for themselves.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics