TITLE

Revenge as the Dark Double of Retributive Punishment

AUTHOR(S)
Kaufman, Whitley
PUB. DATE
June 2016
SOURCE
Philosophia;Jun2016, Vol. 44 Issue 2, p317
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
It is an assumption widely shared by both retributivists and anti-retributivists that revenge is a morally impermissible basis for inflicting harm. Retributivists have thus exercised great ingenuity in demonstrating that retribution is fundamentally different from revenge. But this is, I argue, to misconstrue the problem. The problem is rather to recognize the essential continuity between revenge and retribution, and to address the question whether there is a moral basis for the very idea of inflicting harm in response to moral wrongdoing. I argue that the only plausible such moral justification is the defense of honor, and that the debate needs to be focused on the legitimacy of honor as a moral basis for punishment.
ACCESSION #
117417553

 

Related Articles

  • RETRIBUTION, RESTITUTION AND REVENGE. Klimchuk, Dennis // Law & Philosophy;Jan2001, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p81 

    The article discusses the concepts of retribution, restitution, and revenge. Critics of retributivism often complain that retributivists substitute metaphor for argument just when the questions become difficult. Principal among these are metaphors of commerce. Retributive ideas are often cashed...

  • Two Cheers for Forgiveness (and Even Fewer for Revenge). Hughes, Paul // Philosophia;Jun2016, Vol. 44 Issue 2, p361 

    In this paper I critically discuss what has come to be known as the consensus or standard view of interpersonal forgiveness noting some of the paradoxes it appears to generate, how its conceptual resources seem unable to help illuminate several other varieties of forgiveness that are either...

  • REVENGE.  // Shamans & Kushakas;1991, p59 

    This article presents the short story "Revenge."

  • No keeping score.  // Christian Century;01/31/2001, Vol. 118 Issue 4, p11 

    Discusses the retaliatory response to an injury received. Ethics of the kingdom; Lesson from Joseph in the Bible; What victims must rediscover for themselves.

  • McVeigh to Macbeth. Young, Cathy // Reason;Jul2001, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p20 

    Focuses on the debate over capital punishment in the United States in light of the scheduled execution of Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh. Argument regarding state-sanctioned killing; Issue of whether capital punishment is a form of vengeance; Difference between revenge and retribution;...

  • Revenge, Retribution, and Values: Social Attitudes and Punitive Sentencing. McKee, Ian R.; Feather, N. T. // Social Justice Research;Jun2008, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p138 

    This study examined the pattern of relations between vengeance attitudes, right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), and social dominance orientation (SDO) using the structure of value types proposed by Schwartz ( Adv Exp Soc Psychol 25:1–65, 1992). Relations between these variables and support...

  • Coming Clean on Getting Even: Murphy on Hatred and Criminal Justice. Zipursky, Benjamin C. // APA Newsletters;Fall2008, Vol. 8 Issue 1, Special section p6 

    The author attempts to determine what law professor Jeffrie G. Murphy means in advocating coming clean on vengeful passions, and its implications on feelings of hatred, vindictiveness, and retribution. According to the author, the issue raises two types of questions, one is a metaethical...

  • The Three Rs: Retribution, Revenge, and Reparation. Sommers, Tamler // Philosophia;Jun2016, Vol. 44 Issue 2, p327 

    Nearly all retributive theories of punishment adopt the following model. Punishments are justified when the wrongdoers receive the punishment they deserve. A deserved punishment is one that is proportionate to the offender's culpability. Culpability has two components: (1) the severity of the...

  • Support for Harsh Criminal Sanctions and Criminal Justice Beliefs: A Social Dominance Perspective. Sidanius, Jim; Mitchell, Michael; Haley, Hillary; Navarrete, Carlos // Social Justice Research;Dec2006, Vol. 19 Issue 4, p433 

    Much of the criminal justice literature indicates that people’s support for harsh criminal sanctions such as the death penalty is strongly related to their beliefs about deterrence and their beliefs about retribution. In this paper, using social dominance theory as our organizing...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics