TITLE

Indict the Murderers of Oslo Peace!

AUTHOR(S)
Avnery, Uri
PUB. DATE
January 2003
SOURCE
Philosophy & Social Action;Jan-Mar2003, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p67
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Presents information on the Oslo Agreement for Israeli-Palestinian peace process. Criticism on the agreement; Dangerous situation created by the disappointments in the agreement; Violence which could have been avoided if the agreement had succeeded.
ACCESSION #
11632306

 

Related Articles

  • Hijacking the Intifada? Blanche, Ed // Middle East;Jan2005, Issue 352, p20 

    This article reports on Al Qaeda's widening infiltration of Lebanon and the prospects of the Palestinian Intifada being hijacked to promote terror. The demise of Yaseer Arafat who for four decades embodied the struggle for Palestinian statehood, may well ignite a potentially catastrophic power...

  • Final outcome.  // Christian Century;6/28/2003, Vol. 120 Issue 13, p5 

    Examines the implications of renewed violence in the Middle East for the Arab-Israeli peace process. Instances of violence; Sequence of the road map to peace; Outlook for the effort.

  • Misunderstood peace dividends. Losman, Donald // Christian Science Monitor;12/22/99, Vol. 92 Issue 20, p10 

    Contends that peace dividends in the Arab-Israeli conflict are not the solution for peace. Five conditions a peace treaty would have to meet to ensure economic development as well as peace.

  • PEACE OPERATIONS AS AN INSTRUMENT OF U.S. POLICY. Hughes, Arthur // Foreign Service Journal;May2006, Vol. 83 Issue 5, p50 

    The article reports on the creation of the Multinational Force and Observers (MFO) as a mechanism for implementing peace agreements in the Middle East. The MFO can be a model for a foreign policy tool. It played a partnership role in helping to build confidence, stability and peace between Egypt...

  • Both sides must want to negotiate. SHERMAN, DAVID A. // Jewish Advocate;3/29/2013, Vol. 204 Issue 13, p7 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article about the need for peace negotiation between Israel and Palestine, in the March 2013 issue.

  • Precarious vision. Hecht, James L. // Christian Century;11/15/2005, Vol. 122 Issue 23, p9 

    This article expresses doubt over the capability of the Geneva Accord signed by 30 prominent Israelis and 22 Palestinians in November 2003 to attain its objectives. The author begins by looking at what he thinks as barriers to peace. According to him, these barriers cannot be overcome unless the...

  • Camp David Negotiators Fail to Resolve `Core Issue' of Jerusalem. Bird, Eugene // Washington Report on Middle East Affairs;Aug2000, Vol. 19 Issue 7, p6 

    Focuses on the failure of the negotiation at Camp David, Maryland to resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict. Management of the peace conference by American negotiators; Root causes of the failure of the negotiation; Suggestion for negotiators to seek a true reconciliation between the Palestinians...

  • Peace Talks at Critical Stage as Camp David Ends in Failure. Meehan, Maureen // Washington Report on Middle East Affairs;Aug2000, Vol. 19 Issue 7, p10 

    Focuses on the critical stage of the peace talks between Israel and Palestine due to the failure of the negotiation at the Camp David summit in Maryland. Division of a Palestine public opinion; Speculations on the Palestinian leadership declaration; Rumor on the establishment of Palestinian...

  • The Israeli-Palestinian Summit: A Reality Check. Ostrovsky, Victor // Washington Report on Middle East Affairs;Aug2000, Vol. 19 Issue 7, p13 

    Focuses on issues on the Israeli-Palestinian peace summit in Camp David, Maryland. Declaration of Israel of its desire for peace; Problem of conflicting agendas on the Knesset, the Israeli parliament; Demands of Palestinians for a democratic state.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics