TITLE

Dry Well for Sanity

AUTHOR(S)
Forbes, Steve
PUB. DATE
November 2003
SOURCE
Forbes Global;11/24/2003, Vol. 6 Issue 22, p16
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Comments on conducting oil exploration in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Benefits of conducting the oil exploration; Cause of the environmental problems that occur when conducting oil drillings.
ACCESSION #
11532697

 

Related Articles

  • Counterpoint: Saving the Alaskan Frontier. Witherbee, Amy // Points of View: Arctic Drilling;3/1/2016, p6 

    This article presents an argument against drilling in Alaska. The United States has a strong history of working to protect its natural resources. Consisting of an impressive 20 million acres in northern Alaska, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) was created in 1960 to preserve this...

  • Gentler footsteps on the tundra. Satchell, Michael // U.S. News & World Report;3/25/2002, Vol. 132 Issue 9, p52 

    Discusses ways that technology could lessen the impact of oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. Example of Alpine field in Alaska, operated by Phillips Alaska, that has had a minimal impact on the environment; Technological innovations in drilling that allows for fewer...

  • Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: oil field or wilderness? Spitler, Amanda // BioScience;Nov87, Vol. 37 Issue 10, p714 

    Discusses the debate over the prospect of oil and gas drilling on the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge by the U.S. Congress. Consideration of the Congressional hearings held by the House Interior Committee, the House Merchant Marine Committee, and the Senate Energy Committee; Importance of...

  • Arctic Oil, Frozen Dialogue.  // Christian Science Monitor;8/30/2000, Vol. 92 Issue 196, p10 

    Presents opinions on the 2000 United States presidential candidates views on oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge of Alaska.

  • Should We Drill in Alaska?  // Junior Scholastic;9/17/2001, Vol. 104 Issue 2, p5 

    Argues the viability of drilling oil and natural gas in Alaska. Percentage of the American citizens opposing to the oil drilling; Views of environmentalists on land and wildlife of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge; Recognition on the need for additional energy sources.

  • Is ANWR The Answer To Our Energy Riddle? Nelson, Ronald // Pipeline & Gas Journal;May2005, Vol. 232 Issue 5, p45 

    Provides some insights into the development of petroleum resources in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge of northeast Alaska. Implementation of initial exploration tests using slim hole technology by heli-drill rigs to minimize the need for environmental damage; Oil production and transmission...

  • Oil debate in Alaska is all in a name. Rosen, Yereth // Christian Science Monitor;6/29/95, Vol. 87 Issue 150, p4 

    Discusses the conflict between oil development and environmental preservation due to the oil drilling project of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) in Alaska. Debate on the subject; Details of the government decision to endorse oil drilling by the ANWR.

  • To the highest bidder. Schapiro, Mark // Environmental Action;Winter96, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p9 

    Reports on the debate on the opening of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling. Extent of access of lobbyists to decision-makers; Assault on the 1995 Clean Water Act.

  • ALASKA'S Oil War. Ebersole, Rene S. // Current Science;4/6/2001, Vol. 86 Issue 14, p8 

    Solicits views related to oil exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. Commitment of oil companies to drill the area without damaging the environment; Support of United States President George Bush for the exploration plans; Disadvantages of advanced oil drilling technology.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics