TITLE

US court case challenges climate change warning

AUTHOR(S)
Pearce, Fred
PUB. DATE
October 2003
SOURCE
New Scientist;10/11/2003, Vol. 180 Issue 2416, p12
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Global climate models are to face the scrutiny of the U.S. courts. A lobby group is taking legal action against the U.S. government for publishing results from one of the world's top climate models that predict sea levels and temperatures in the U.S. will rise. The spat began with the publication of Climate Action Report 2002 by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2003. The report warns that climate change is a clear and present threat to the U.S., relying on predictions from a model run by the respected Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research in Great Britain. But this has sparked the ire of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a right-wing lobby group based in Washington D.C. It has accused the EPA of publishing "knowingly fictional" science, and is suing the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy for failing to block the report.
ACCESSION #
11154271

 

Related Articles

  • EPA's Jackson not flinching on regulation. Verespej, Mike // Plastics News;3/15/2010, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p9 

    The article reports that according to Lisa Jackson, administrator of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the agency's approach to today's environmental issues is the right one. Jackson is unaffected by the lawsuits filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to challenge...

  • Climate for EPA changing.  // Waste News;4/16/2007, Vol. 12 Issue 25, p8 

    The article comments on the judgment of U.S. Supreme Court that the Environmental Protection Agency has the authority to regulate emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. The Supreme Court ruled that the EPA can do that and should be guided by science alone, not politics. The EPA...

  • Massachusetts v. EPA: A Change of Climate at EPA Clouds the D.C. Circuit's Review of Risk-Based Policy Decisions. Smith, Joel D. // Ecology Law Quarterly;2006, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p653 

    It is well established that the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency has broad policy-making discretion when responding to uncertain environmental risks. Yet there are important limitations to that principle. An agency can exercise policy judgments only to the extent that...

  • environmental monitoring.  // Sea Technology;Mar2009, Vol. 50 Issue 3, p60 

    The article reports developments related to environmental protection in the U.S. Researchers from Scripps Institution of Oceanography focused to the threat of ocean acidification. Environmentalists filed two separate lawsuits in January 2009 to challenge pollution caps that the Environmental...

  • Massachusetts v. EPA, 127 S. Ct. 1438 (2007). Rancilio, Erica L. // Tulane Environmental Law Journal;Dec2008, Vol. 22 Issue 1, Special section p5 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff suffers an injury to its interests as a sovereign entity due to the refusal of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate greenhouse gas emitted from new motor vehicles which cause global warming. The Court of Appeals is...

  • Supreme Court decides that Clean Air Act displaces federal common law claims for climate change. MAY, JAMES // Trends (15339556);Sep2011, Vol. 43 Issue 1, p1 

    The article offers information on the U.S. Supreme Court case of American Electric Power Co. versus Connecticut. It states that 8 states and several land trust organizations sued 5 largest fossil fuel burning electric utility companies, to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG). It...

  • Climate change goes to court. Ananthaswamy, Anil // New Scientist;10/23/2010, Vol. 208 Issue 2783, p01 

    The article focuses on lawsuits related to climate change in the U.S. It states the Alaskan village of Kivalina is suing 24 energy companies claiming rising temperatures from global warming have resulted in erosion and wants the companies to pay for relocation of the village. It comments that...

  • Unintended Effects Need Examination. Laws, Elliott P. // Environmental Forum;Nov/Dec2009, Vol. 26 Issue 6, p16 

    The article discusses the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper Inc. case in April 2009. The Court ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the authority to consider costs and benefits in proclaiming regulations under the Clean Water Act...

  • Climate change suits await U.S. Supreme Court action. CASALE, JEFF // Business Insurance;11/15/2010, Vol. 44 Issue 45, p19 

    this article reports on climate change cases facing the U.S. Supreme Court as appeals court rulings presented an opportunity for lawsuits against greenhouse gas emitters. Particular focus is given to the dismissal of the Ned Comer et al vs. Murphy Oil USA et al in the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics