TITLE

DR. MICHAEL BEHE (PART TWO)

PUB. DATE
September 2014
SOURCE
In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal;Sep2014, Issue 5A, p65
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Second part of an extensive and thorough two-part interview with Professor of Biochemistry at Lehigh University, Dr. Michael Behe, on the following topics: influence of world views on scientific output; philosophical and cosmological considerations for biological systems and origins; Sir Karl Popper, falsificationism, and predictions of intelligent design theory; considerations of changes in the scientific method and relation to intelligent design; 2005 paper entitled Scientific Orthodoxies, intellectual climate among mainstream Catholic discussions on scientific or theological matters; Kitzmiller v. Dover Board of Education in December of 2005 and view of litigation with respect to intelligent design v. evolution; The Wedge Document of the Discovery Institute; advice do you have for young scientists; upcoming projects; and intelligent design in the near and far future.
ACCESSION #
111155153

 

Related Articles

  • DR. MICHAEL BEHE (PART ONE).  // In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal;Sep2014, Issue 5A, p57 

    First part of an extensive and thorough two-part interview with Professor of Biochemistry at Lehigh University, Dr. Michael Behe, on the following topics: youth and interest in science and the natural world; pivotal moments motivating his trajectory into the study of biology; root of differences...

  • Flagella Myths. Perakh, Mark // Skeptic;2008, Vol. 14 Issue 3, p20 

    The article discusses how the Intelligent Design (ID) proponents created the myth that bacteria flagella look like man-made machines. When a mousetrap was not very successful example to illustrate Michael Behe's concept of irreducible complexity (IC), his ID colleagues switched to bacterial...

  • Darwin sceptic says views cost tenure. Brumfiel, Geoff // Nature;5/24/2007, Vol. 447 Issue 7143, p364 

    The article reports on the denial of tenure for Guillermo Gonzales at the Iowa State University. It is stated that is was due to his idea that an intelligent force has shaped the Universe. HE appealed the decision on the grounds which his religious belief was the basis for turning down his...

  • BIOCHEMICAL COMPLEXITY: EMERGENCE OR DESIGN? Weber, Bruce H. // Rhetoric & Public Affairs;Winter98, Vol. 1 Issue 4, p611 

    The article assesses the fundamental claims of intelligent design theorist Michael Behe that biochemical complexity is irreducible and that it is impossible to scientifically explore its emergence. The author reviews various attempts by researchers of developmental biology to explain the...

  • DR. MICHAEL BEHE (PART ONE). Jacobsen, Scott Douglas // In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal;Summer2014, Issue 5, p57 

    An interview with Michael J. Behe, a professor of biochemistry at Lehigh University is presented. He cites his motivation for studying biology. He discusses the concept of irreducible complexity with redundant complexity and intelligent design theoretic responses in biology. He shares his...

  • WHILE WE'RE AT IT. Neuhaus, Richard John // First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Jan1997, Issue 69, p69 

    Deals with the position of the Catholic Church on evolution. Background on the remarks of the Pope John Paul II on evolution; Theories of origin that are incompatible with Christian faith; Comment of biochemist Michael J. Behe on the statement of the pope.

  • La llama áurea de Darwin. Respuestas de la Bioquímica al diseño inteligente. Sanz, Vicente Claramonte // Teorema;2009, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p173 

    The article outlines a scientific answer to the objections formulated against the evolutionary theory at the chemical--molecular level for Michael Behe in his book "Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution." For such purpose it presents, by means of a selection among the most...

  • Praise for the Behes. Louttit, Gordon // Humanist;Nov/Dec2011, Vol. 71 Issue 6, p5 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the intelligent design promoter Professor Michael Behe and his son Leo who disagrees with intelligent design.

  • DESIGNING CRITICS. Arnhart, Larry // Skeptic;2000, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p20 

    Presents a summary of the major arguments made by creationist proponents of intelligent design theory (IDT) in the United States. Inability of Darwinism to explain irreducible complexity according to biochemist Michael Behe; Difference of IDT from traditional creationism; Social psychological...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics