Congress and the military revisited

Isaacs, John
February 1986
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Feb1986, Vol. 42 Issue 2, p6
Focuses on U.S. Congress's legislative work on arms control and military budget issues in 1985. Passage of the Gramm-Rudman legislation that is expected to require deep cuts in military spending; Factors in the Pentagon's 1985 legislative success; Factors that came into play in 1985 that will continue to haunt 1986 efforts to produce a better arms control outcome in Congress.


Related Articles

  • Congress tries again in arms control. Isaacs, John // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jun1987, Vol. 43 Issue 5, p3 

    Examines the U.S. congressional activity regarding arms control in the U.S. Convergence of views between Democratic centrists and Democratic liberals in support of strong arms control legislation; Five major arms control measures voted for by the House of Representatives; U.S.-Soviet agreement...

  • Congress and the arms control paradox. Isaacs, John // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jan1985, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p9 

    Focuses on actions of the U.S. Congress toward major arms control and foreign policies in the U.S. Adoption of resolutions pressuring the President Reagan into more serious arms control efforts; Emphasis on arms control and military budget issues; Activities of organizations concerned with...

  • Action In Congress Since 1976.  // Congressional Digest;Apr78, Vol. 57 Issue 4, p105 

    Reports on activities and legislation in the U.S. Congress as of April 1978. Arms Export Control Act; Arms Control Impact Statements; Congressional hearings.

  • Senate passes chemical weapons bill.  // Human Events;05/02/97, Vol. 53 Issue 17, p22 

    Focuses on US Senate's passing of the Chemical and Biological Threat Reduction Act of 1997. Rollcall vote; Strengthening of international arms control regimes on chemical and biological arms trade; Unworkable alternative to the Chemical Weapons Convention.

  • Republican Senate Rejection of START Could Actually Work in Disarmament's Favor. Wellen, Russ // Foreign Policy in Focus;11/10/2010, p2 

    The article focuses on the significance of the possible rejection of the strategic arms reduction treaty (START) by the U.S. Republican Senate to disarmament. In an article in the "New York Times," John Bolton and John Yoo stressed the need for the Senate to either reject or amend START to...

  • Should The U.S. Deploy Now An Ant-Ballistic Missile System? CON. Symington, Stuart; Cooper, John Sherman.; McCarthy, Eugene J.; McGovern, George S.; Cohelan, Jeffery; Leggett, Robert L. // Congressional Digest;Nov68, Vol. 47 Issue 11, p269 

    Presents opinions of several members of the U.S. Congress on the disadvantages of deploying an anti-ballistic missile (ABM) system in the country as of November 1968. Skepticism expressed against the U.S. claim of defense against the Soviet Union and China; Cost of deploying the system; Effects...

  • House challenges Reagan on arms control. Isaacs, John // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Oct1986, Vol. 42 Issue 8, p6 

    Analyzes the 210-209 vote in the U.S. House of Representatives on August 13, 1986 for an amendment barring chemical weapons production for one year. Five key issues of the amendment; Impact of the amendment on arms control; Other arms control legislation passed by the Congress. INSET: Five key...

  • The fall and rise of Les Aspin. Isaacs, John // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Apr1987, Vol. 43 Issue 3, p4 

    Comments on legislator Les Aspin's rise and near-fall as Armed Services Committee chairman in the U.S. House of Representatives. Aspin's penchant for dividing the arms control community; Chairmanship that was won by Aspin in 1985 with base support of liberals; Opposition to Aspin in 1986;...

  • The Eisenhower Administration and the Nuclear Test Ban Talks, 1958–1960: Another Challenge to “Revisionism”. Smith-Norris, Martha // Diplomatic History;Sep2003, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p503 

    When the U.S. Senate voted against the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) in 1999, the world community reacted with dismay. Three years before the U.S. rejected the agreement, it had been endorsed by a large majority of the United Nations General Assembly. Supporters of the accord argued that...

  • Delayed Reaction.  // Time;12/23/1974, Vol. 104 Issue 26, p12 

    The article reports on the delayed response of the U.S. Senate concerning the ratification of an international treaty which limits the use of arms during warfare.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics