Getting over the summit

Sigal, Leon V.
January 1987
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jan/Feb1987, Vol. 43 Issue 1, p12
Comments on the outcome of nuclear arms control conferences between the U.S. and the Soviet Union held in Vienna, Austria and Reykjavik, Iceland in 1986. Cutting down of false hopes for arms control; Outline of two possible arms control deals between the U.S. and the Soviet Union; Proposals from both sides; Soviets' propaganda campaign in Europe.


Related Articles

  • New Zealand paying for nuclear ban. Clements, Kevin P. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jul/Aug1987, Vol. 43 Issue 6, p41 

    Outlines the major outcomes of New Zealand's unilateral antinuclear stance which represents one small country's unilateral effort in stimulating the more rapid progress on bilateral and multilateral disarmament negotiations and wean the superpowers from their dependence on nuclear weapons. ...

  • Domestic upheaval, for a change. Rosen, Jack // Washington Jewish Week;1/5/2012, Vol. 48 Issue 1, p16 

    In the article, the author discusses the developments in Israel, particularly its relationships with its neighboring countries. He cites the claim by the Joint Chiefs of Staff American chairman that Iran is on course of attaining nuclear weapons capacity in a year. He also tackles such issues as...

  • Geostrategy-Direct - Beneath rejection rhetoric, Arabs said to see Israel as security partner; Gulf analyst sees Israel-Egypt-Jordan alliance as key to security; U.S. concludes major radar upgrade for UAE missile defense.  // Geo-Strategy Direct;8/4/2010, p5 

    The article reports that Arab countries see Israel as a security in countering threat from Iran. U.S. representative Gary Ackerman states that none of the Arab leaders consider Israel as threat and think that it can stop Iran's expansion in the Middle East. It states that these states are...

  • Fresh take on nuclear crisis.  // MEED: Middle East Economic Digest;11/18/2011, Vol. 55 Issue 46, p6 

    The article comments that the existing restrictions on Iran have only been effective in slowing Iran's nuclear programme up until now and the international community needs a new strategy to deal with the nuclear programme of Iran.

  • Should We Buy the Vladivostok Agreement? Long, F. A. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Feb1975, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p5 

    The article reflects on the Vladivostok agreement, an agreement between the United States and USSR which was intended to control the strategic nuclear arms race. Comments about the limitations of the agreement including the control of the strategic delivery systems of the U.S. and the Soviet...

  • Excerpts from the 1985 statement of the Pugwash Council.  // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Nov1985, Vol. 41 Issue 10, p45 

    Presents excerpts from the 1985 statement of the Pugwash Council on sustainable peace. Reversal of the nuclear arms race; Improvement of the management of East-West relations; Problems innate in conditions in the South and in North-South interactions; List of recommended solutions to the...

  • Responding to a Nuclear Iran. Hemmer, Christopher // Parameters: U.S. Army War College;Fall2007, Vol. 37 Issue 3, p42 

    The article examines the foreign policy of the U.S. in discouraging Iran from developing nuclear weapons. The impact of the Iran's nuclear policy on the economic interest of the U.S. around the Persian Gulf., as well as the cost of taking military actions. Deterring Iran from using the weapons,...

  • Formal treaties and tacit agreements: an exchange. Bilder, Richard B. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Apr1985, Vol. 41 Issue 4, p51 

    Comments on correspondent Russell Hardin's argument in his article 'Contracts, Promises, and Arms Control' that formal and legally binding treaties between the U.S. and the Soviet Union have inhibited progress in achieving arms control. Questioning of Hardin's suggestion that non-binding...

  • A rejoinder. Hardin, Russell // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Apr1985, Vol. 41 Issue 4, p53 

    Replies to Richard Bilder's critique of the author's argument that formal and legally binding treaties between the U.S. and the Soviet Union have inhibited progress in achieving arms control. Areas in which treaties are best at ratifying the status quo; Steady escalation in armaments that have...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics