TITLE

Address exposure and discovery challenges early in class action litigation

AUTHOR(S)
Fisher, Eric S.; Grelecki, Ryan C.
PUB. DATE
October 2015
SOURCE
Inside Counsel (SyndiGate Media Inc.);10/22/2015, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the cost of class action litigation and pre-certification discovery process in the U.S. Topics discussed include the criteria that a plaintiff must meet before requesting for class action certification from the court, the results of a 2010 study conducted by the California Administrative Office of the Courts on the cost of prolonged class actions and the impact of class actions on companies.
ACCESSION #
110574523

 

Related Articles

  • Slowing Securities. Flahardy, Cathleen // InsideCounsel;Sep2011, Vol. 22 Issue 237, p14 

    The article reports on decreasing securities class action suits against U.S. companies as of June 2011.

  • What Goes Around, Comes Around: From the Rector of Barkway to Knowles. Vairo, Georgene // Review of Litigation;Symposium2013, Vol. 32 Issue 4, p721 

    No abstract available.

  • Identity Crisis: Class Certification, Aggregate Proof, and How Rule 23 May Be Self-Defeating the Policy for Which It Was Established. Whitbeck, J. Britton // Pace Law Review;Mar2012, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p488 

    The article discusses American class action lawsuits and class certification under Rule 23 of the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as of March 2012, focusing on the role of aggregate proof in the certification of classes. A historical overview of class action litigation is presented,...

  • ADDRESSING WHAT ISN'T THERE: HOW DISTRICT COURTS MANAGE THE THREAT OF RULE 68'S COST-SHIFTING PROVISION IN THE CONTEXT OF CLASS ACTIONS. Starcher, Jack // Columbia Law Review;Jan2014, Vol. 114 Issue 1, p129 

    For almost two decades now, courts have struggled with a seemingly irreconcilable conflict between Rule 23 class actions and Rule 68 offers of judgment. The apparent tension between these two rules arises in the limbo between the filing of a putative class representative's complaint and the...

  • SIMPLIFIED PLEADING, MEANINGFUL DAYS IN COURT, AND TRIALS ON THE MERITS: REFLECTIONS ON THE DEFORMATION OF FEDERAL PROCEDURE. MILLER, ARTHUR R. // New York University Law Review;Apr2013, Vol. 88 Issue 1, p286 

    When the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were promulgated in 1938, they reflected a policy of citizen access for civil disputes and sought to promote their resolution on the merits rather than on the basis of the technicalities that characterized earlier procedural systems.The federal courts...

  • DISCRETION IN CLASS CERTIFICATION. BARRINGTON WOLFF, TOBIAS // University of Pennsylvania Law Review;Jun2014, Vol. 162 Issue 7, p1897 

    The article discusses an abuse of discretion standard in class certification in America, focusing on the class action-related jurisprudence of various U.S. federal and district courts, as well as information about Rule 23 of the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which deals with class action...

  • Effective Discovery Strategies in Class-Action Litigation. Singh, David R.; Curioni, Gaspard // Corporate Counsel Litigation;Spring2014, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p2 

    The article discusses court cases which were filed regarding class-action litigation in the U.S. It discusses several court cases including Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. Hasbro, Inc., Boeynaems v. LA Fitness International LLC and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Dukes. It also mentions tools for reducing...

  • JURY CERTIFICATION OF FEDERAL SECURITIES FRAUD CLASS ACTIONS. Kayes, Thomas // Northwestern University Law Review;Summer2013, Vol. 107 Issue 4, p1851 

    The rough equivalence of certification and ultimate outcome is class action dogma. If certification is granted, then the plaintiff "wins" by settlement because the risk of incurring class-wide liability by going to trial is too great. If certification is denied, the defendant "wins" because the...

  • The Failed Superiority Experiment. Bartholomew, Christine P. // Vanderbilt Law Review;Oct2016, Vol. 69 Issue 5, p1295 

    Federal law requires a class action be "superior to alternative methods for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy." This superiority requirement has gone unstudied, despite existing for half a century. This Article undertakes a comprehensive review of the superiority case law. It...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics