TITLE

The Paradox of Dissent

AUTHOR(S)
Mistry, Hemi
PUB. DATE
July 2015
SOURCE
Journal of International Criminal Justice;Jul2015, Vol. 13 Issue 3, p449
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Additional opinions - dissenting opinions, separate opinions, declarations and permutations thereof - are a familiar, if sometimes controversial, aspect of the international jurisprudential landscape. Given that the controversy provoked by additional opinions focuses on their perceived impact on the authority of judgments and decisions of international tribunals, and even the authority of the institutions themselves, additional opinions go to the heart of the manner in, and effectiveness by, which international tribunals discharge their functions. Yet, particularly in the context of international criminal justice, additional opinions have often been overlooked as a subject of critical engagement in their own right. Therefore, the purpose of this article is bring into focus the practice of judicial dissent, that is, the expression of strongly held and fundamental disagreement by judges through the vehicle of the additional opinion, and to stimulate a wider critical engagement with dissentient judicial practice. Rather than providing a review of the orthodox and doctrinal arguments in favour and against the publication of additional opinions, this article offers a reading of five prominent examples of judicial dissent in international criminal law and suggests how this practice could be conceived from the perspective of the functions that international criminal adjudication is expected to serve.
ACCESSION #
108889401

 

Related Articles

  • Problems of Participation — Unitarian, Differentiated Approach, or Something Else? Vest, Hans // Journal of International Criminal Justice;May2014, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p295 

    In two recent judgements handed down by the International Criminal Court, the majority’s understanding of the law and modes of participation has triggered vigorous dissenting opinions (Section 1). The debate has focused on the question of whether there is an explicit or implicit hierarchy...

  • International Criminal Justice in the Asia-Pacific Region. Freeland, Steven // Journal of International Criminal Justice;Dec2013, Vol. 11 Issue 5, p1029 

    Even as the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) continues to gain increasing acceptance worldwide, the number of states parties within the Asia-Pacific region remains relatively low when compared to Europe, Africa and the Americas. Although the position may be slowly changing,...

  • Ratification Patterns and the International Criminal Court. CHAPMAN, TERRENCE L.; CHAUDOIN, STEPHEN // International Studies Quarterly;Jun2013, Vol. 57 Issue 2, p400 

    What types of countries have ratified the Rome Statute establishing the International Criminal Court? Because the court relies on state cooperation, it is a good example of a regime facing a "participation problem." In order to be effective, the regime requires active members, but states that...

  • Preventive Potential of the International Criminal Court. Sang-Hyun, SONG // Asian Journal of International Law;Jul2013, Vol. 3 Issue 2, p203 

    This article discusses the transition of international criminal justice from a predominantly ex post facto punitive concept of post World War II efforts—and the ad hoc tribunals set up in the 1990s—towards a more comprehensive concept of justice centred around the International...

  • EDITORIAL: Between ‘Faith’ and ‘Facts’: By What Standards Should We Assess International Criminal Justice? STAHN, CARSTEN // Leiden Journal of International Law;Jun2012, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p251 

    The traditional vision that international courts and tribunals do ‘good’ or create a better world through law is increasingly under question. International criminal justice started largely as a ‘faith’-based project, but is increasingly criticized in light of its actual...

  • The Principle of Proportionality in International Criminal Law. BAGHI, Venus GHAREH; MARUTHI, T. R. // Acta Universitatis Danubius: Juridica;2011, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p5 

    The principle of proportionality indicated to, are that the criminal codes should contain specific maximums for crime or category of crimes. As to the applicable penalty, should be made distinctive not only between types of crimes but also between completed crimes and inchoate crimes....

  • Reassembling International Justice: The Making of ‘the Social’ in International Criminal Law and Transitional Justice. Campbell, Kirsten // International Journal of Transitional Justice;Mar2014, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p53 

    This article examines the most recent shift in ongoing debates concerning the relationship between international criminal law and transitional justice, using the examples of international criminal prosecutions before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and...

  • Perpetration through an Organization. Weigend, Thomas // Journal of International Criminal Justice;Mar2011, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p91 

    Indirect perpetration is a rather novel concept in international criminal law, mentioned explicitly for the first time in Article 25(3)(a) of the International Criminal Court (ICC) Statute. In its Katanga and Chui decision, ICC Pre-Trial Chamber I interprets the concept of indirect perpetration...

  • Constitutive acts of international courts as regulators of legal assistance in criminal matters. Lazutin, L. A. // Russian Juridical Journal / Rossijskij Juridiceskij Zurnal;Nov2012, Vol. 86 Issue 6, p242 

    Constitutive acts of international judicial institutions, containing the norms on international cooperation and mutual legal assistance on specific criminal cases are considered. The list of the proceedings which correspond to the volume of mutual legal assistance as provided for in...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics