TITLE

THE SEARCH FOR MEANING: THE WORD

AUTHOR(S)
STOCKTON, EUGENE
PUB. DATE
December 2014
SOURCE
Compass (10369686);Summer2014, Vol. 48 Issue 4, p31
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The author presents a reflection of the search for meaning, pursuit of the True, the Good and the Beautiful. Topics include patterns of the truth, psychology, biblical typology, and the Words of God. The author emphasizes that the True, Good and the Beautiful pertain to one God whom people are hunger and thirst.
ACCESSION #
101440593

 

Related Articles

  • GOD'S DIVINELY JUSTIFIED KNOWLEDGE IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH HUMAN FREE WILL. SHOOK, JOHN // Forum Philosophicum;Spring2010, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p141 

    A new version of the incompatibilist argument is developed. Knowledge is (at least)justified true belief. If God's divine knowledge must be justified knowledge, then humans cannot have the "alternative possibilities" type of free will. This incompatibilist argument is immunized against the...

  • God knows (but does God believe?). Murray, Dylan; Sytsma, Justin; Livengood, Jonathan // Philosophical Studies;Oct2013, Vol. 166 Issue 1, p83 

    The standard view in epistemology is that propositional knowledge entails belief. Positive arguments are seldom given for this entailment thesis, however; instead, its truth is typically assumed. Against the entailment thesis, Myers-Schulz and Schwitzgebel ( Noûs, forthcoming) report that a...

  • knowing vs. believing. Radha, Swami Sivananda // Ascent Magazine;Fall2005, Issue 27, p10 

    Probes into the concept of beliefs, which are usually based on the words of a person that are considered an authority, versus knowledge, which is usually based on facts and experience. Link between beliefs and imagination; Significance of doubting; Distinction between beliefs and knowledge from...

  • Omniscient beings are dialetheists. Milne, Peter // Analysis;Jul2007, Vol. 67 Issue 295, p250 

    In this article the author examines the existence of omniscient beings and what knowledge they may hold if they exist. The author philosophically works his way through this examination, reaching the conclusion that if omniscient beings exist then they are all dialetheists, meaning that they...

  • CONFLICTING HIGHER AND LOWER ORDER EVIDENCES IN THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF DISAGREEMENT ABOUT RELIGION. KRAFT, JAMES // Forum Philosophicum;Spring2010, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p65 

    This paper concentrates on the issue of what happens to the confidence one has in the justification of one's belief when one discovers an epistemic peer with conflicting higher and/or lower order evidences. Certain symmetries surface during epistemic peer disagreement, which tend to make one...

  • SOCIAL ROUTES TO BELIEF AND KNOWLEDGE. Goldman, Alvin I. // Monist;Jul2001, Vol. 84 Issue 3, p346 

    Examines general approaches to the social causation or propagation of belief and knowledge. Relationship of doxology and epistemology; Memetics and the epidemiology of belief; Problems in the centrality of imitation in cultural diffusion; Contagion model of belief transmission; Cultural...

  • Truth Café. Linville, Mark // Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity;Sep2006, Vol. 19 Issue 7, p19 

    The article focuses on the philosophical views on truth under relativism. For relativists, truth is, well, relative. What may be true to one person may not be true for others. Thus, truth cannot be imposed to another person who may have his own perspectives. Being a relativist would mean having...

  • Why safety doesn't save closure. Alspector-Kelly, Marc // Synthese;Nov2011, Vol. 183 Issue 2, p127 

    Knowledge closure is, roughly, the following claim: Almost every epistemologist believes that closure is true. Indeed, they often believe that it so obviously true that any theory implying its denial is thereby refuted. Some prominent epistemologists have nevertheless denied it, most famously...

  • POPPER'S SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM OF INDUCTION. Howson, Colin // Philosophical Quarterly;Apr84, Vol. 34 Issue 135, p143 

    Focuses on Popper's solution to the problem of induction. Inference to truth of universal statements; Dominance arguments of decision-theorists.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics