TITLE

CRIMINAL LAW

AUTHOR(S)
STODDART, CRAIG; CULPEPPER, KENDA
PUB. DATE
January 2015
SOURCE
Texas Bar Journal;Jan2015, Vol. 78 Issue 1, p31
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the attitude of Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on constitutionality of statutes as signified by the legislature of the U.S. in reference to various cases like Riley v. California, and State of Texas v. Villarreal. It discusses the claims of possessing illegally concealed and loaded firearms against David Riley at traffic stop. It further discusses the claims for violation of right of an individual to be free from unlawful searches.
ACCESSION #
100270091

 

Related Articles

  • FOURTH AMENDMENT--THE COURT FURTHER LIMITS STANDING. Lauer, Rebecca J. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Winter1980, Vol. 71 Issue 4, p567 

    This article examines the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions in the cases of Payner, Rawlings and Salvucci in relation to the fourth amendment clause of the U.S. Constitutional law which guarantees the right of individuals to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against...

  • THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL v. DANHAI WILLIAMS AND DANWILLS CONSTRUCTION LIMITED.  // Jamaica Law Reports 1996: Volume 34;1996, Vol. 34, p229 

    The article discusses a court case wherein a group of respondents filed a motion claiming their fundamental rights violated when a warrant was authorized to search their property and remove some documents. In 1992, the respondents were suspected for fraudulent importation of motor vehicles, and...

  • MAKING RIGHTS. Leong, Nancy // Boston University Law Review;Mar2012, Vol. 92 Issue 2, p405 

    By adjudicating cases, courts make constitutional rights. This Article considers the conditions under which this constitutional rights-making should take place. Ideally, constitutional rights-making should occur simultaneously in multiple remedial, factual, and procedural contexts. In reality,...

  • Samson v. California: Tearing Down a Pillar of Fourth Amendment Protections. Cacace, Robert // Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review;Winter2007, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p223 

    The article discusses the case Samson v. California. In this case, a statute that dispensed with the requirement that a police officer must have individualized suspicion before searching a parolee was upheld by the Court in the name of crime prevention. The effect was that the decision increased...

  • STATE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF SELF-DEFENSE AND DEFENSE OF PROPERTY. Volokh, Eugene // Texas Review of Law & Politics;Spring2007, Vol. 11 Issue 2, p399 

    The article examines the provisions regarding the state constitutional rights to defend life and property in the U.S. The interpretation of the provisions in different cases was taken into account such as on criminal cases, private employer actions and property defense. Key information about the...

  • Advil Strip Search. Sullum, Jacob // Reason;Nov2008, Vol. 40 Issue 6, p16 

    The article discusses a court case of Savana Redding who was strip-searched at the age of 13 by Arizona school officials who are looking for ibuprofen pills in her underwear. The judges hearing the case agreed that vice principal Kerry Wilson's decision to order a grossly intrusive search...

  • Lower Court Holding.  // Supreme Court Debates;Apr2007, Vol. 10 Issue 4, p11 

    The article presents an excerpt from the unanimous opinion written on December 23, 2005 by Rosemary Judge Barkett, of the Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of appeals, on the case Timothy Scott versus Victor Harris, which concerns Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable seizure.

  • Is a Police Officer's Use of Force to End a High-Speed Pursuit Reasonable?: PRO.  // Supreme Court Debates;Apr2007, Vol. 10 Issue 4, p16 

    The article presents an excerpt from the Brief for the Petitioner filed by Timothy Scott, which concerns the use of force by a police officer to end a high-speed chase and the Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable seizure, as submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court on December 13, 2006.

  • Is a Police Officer's Use of Force to End a High-Speed Pursuit Reasonable?: PRO.  // Supreme Court Debates;Apr2007, Vol. 10 Issue 4, p26 

    The article presents an excerpt from the Amicus Curiae Brief for the Petitioner filed by the U.S. government, which concerns the use of force by a police officer to end a high-speed chase and the Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable seizure, as submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court on...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics